Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of May 26 - 30, 2025

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Hamilton v. US Att’y Gen - immigration

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended rules

First Dstrict Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Bonifay v. State - sentencing

Second Distric Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Redmond v. State - sentencing
Urbanski v. Gray - repeat violence injunction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Burgos v. State - jury instruction, harmless error
Recio v. State - postconviction relief
Mitchell v. Faillace - deference to evidentiary ruling
Ortiz v. Nexbank - foreclosure sale, inadequate price
Meruelo v. Meruelo - collateral estoppel
InClaim v. Structural Wrap - default judgment, due diligence
Veizaga v. Labrador - construction of operating agreement
Lucas v. State - mootness, mandamus petition
Progressive v. Oney - insurance bad faith, reasonable settlement
Vista Fin Grp v. Bank of New York - statute of limitations, denial of leave to amend
Jimenez-Solano v. State - sentencing
Vazquez-Gomez v. State - postconviction relief
Alvarez v. State - sentencing

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Gallery One v. Terrace Gallery - condo declaration, statute of repose
Locanto v. Locanto - alimony
Veyberman v. State - waiver, jury instruction
Rebalko v. Atallah - personal jurisdiction, due diligence
Ramos v. State - post conviction relief
Alexander v. Trump - stay, petition, presidency

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Gabor v. Remington Lodging - negligence, directed verdict, vicarious liability
Williams v. State - postconviction relief, sentence, jail credit
Brown v. State - postconviction relief, Habitual Felony Offender

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

McKinney v. Graham - bifurcation, mandate, sanctions
State v. Simpson - suppression, probable cause, smell
HP v. State - involuntary commitment
Douglas v. Sidney - summary disposition


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.