Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of September 2 - 5, 2025
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Prospero v. Sullivan - qualified immunity, misusing 911
Nussbaumer v. Fla DCF - Free Speech, Free Exercise, domestic violence program
Whitesell v. Husqvarna - commercial contract, scope, discovery sanctions
Ashraf v. USDEA - controlled substances, authorized distribution, registration
USA v. Green - sentencing
Dershowitz v. CNN - defamation
Suggs v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla R Crim P - amended rules
In re Fla R App P - amended rule
Murphy v. Polk Cnty Cmmr’s - workers’ compensation
Gartman v. So Tactical Range - stay of appellate mandate
Sedgwick v. Thompson - workers’ compensation
Burton v. State - written opinion request granted, counsel withdrawal
Buchman v. McDonald - personal injury claims, posttrial setoff
Harvis v. State - sentencing
Nationwide v. Auto Glass - failure to prosecute
Ghamra v. Estate of Williams - medical malpractice presuit
Schmidt v. Thobe - contractual indemnity
Desinor v. Citizens - summary judgment, causation, conflicting evidence
ZSF v. State - jaywalking, stop, search incident to arrest
Gutierrez v. Gutierrez - attorney’s fees, evidence
Rojas v. Best Taxi - dismissal, lack of service, no evidentiary hearing
Greenbuild v. Desrouleaux - attorney’s fees, prevailing party
Gomez v. Boardwalk RV - order granting motion to dismiss, appellate jurisdiction
Greene v. State - prison releasee re-offender, no requisite findings of fact
Canstar v. WC WH - dismissal as sanction, no evidentiary hearing
Hertz v. Auto Club - third-party claim, law of case doctrine, citation PCA
Villarreal v. Hernandez - stalking, injunction, evidence
Shaw v. Shaw - insufficient record
Smith v. Holst - insufficient record
Days v. Est of Brown - homestead, final order, vacatur, authority of successor judge
TR v. State - battery, victim’s comments, gang membership
Howard v. State - mandamus, parole release, transfer
Huerte v. Dixon - habeas, barred claims
Islamorada v. Barley - second-tier certiorari, application for abandonment
Perez v. State - postconviction relief
Dorilton v. Schwarz - forum selection clause, non-signatories
Butler v. State - prohibition, self-defense immunity, evidence
Palma v. Alamilla - disqualification of counsel
Griggs v. State - sentence, credit for time served
Marcellus v. Peterson - inequitable conduct, attorney’s fees
Carmenate v. State - oral ruling, written order
Caporizzo v. State - expungement
Graham v. State - oral ruling, written order
Spencer v. State - immunity, self-defense
Garcia v. State - oral ruling, written order
Carlton Condo Assn v. Miniaci - punitive damages
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Bavle v. State - ineffective assistance, trial
Weaver v. State - Anders appeal, public defender fee
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Vana v. State - motion for acquittal
Nevinski v. State - double jeopardy
Davis v. State - sentencing, imposition of fines
Spiro v. State - Anders appeal, court costs
AC & JL Holdings v. Levy - summary judgment, issue of fact
Neu v. State - double jeopardy
Robinson v. Robinson - marital dissolution, equitable distribution
State v. Sipp - Miranda rights, meaning of interrogation
Maskolunas v. Lakeland Reg'l Med Ctr - statute of limitations, retroactivity
Hamilton v. State - suppression of evidence, reasonable suspicion
Williams v. Curry - summary disposition
Carr v. Dep't of Rev - summary disposition
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.