Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of September 15 - 19, 2025

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Oakes Farms v. Adkins - First Amendment, Covid-19
Nute v. White - § 1983, qualified immunity

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


Pryor v. State - sentencing, violent career criminal
Fla Bar v. Marriaga - attorney discipline

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Capps v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Zoble v. Kensington Estates HA - real property, tree branches
Hancock v. Fla Farm Bureau - insurance, bad faith, instructions, verdict form
Stump v. State - sentencing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Peralta-Mejia v. State - prohibition, habeas, immigration custody
Sanchez v. Consolidated Real Est - non-party, standing to appeal
George v. State - postconviction relief
Diaz v. State - possession of sexual performance by child, evidence 
Holguin v. Lourido - will contest, standing 
Universal v. Aragones - attorney’s fees, multiplier, evidence 
Aquastar v. Avant Design - attorney’s fees, intertwined issues
Breton v. Raud - attorney’s fees, evidence, due process
Miami-Dade Cnty v. Fortes - directed verdict, undertaker’s doctrine
Cauble v. Kaczmarski - partition, carrying costs
Simon v. State - postconviction relief
Greenwood v. Greenwood - relocation of child, evidence
Ramirez v. State - burglary, sentence, improper considerations
Fernandez v. Dolphins Cycling - summary judgment, clickwrap agreement
Ferrari v. 170 NE 40 St - execution of illegal writ
Valhuerdi v. State - postconviction relief
Gevaert v. Teh - relocation of child, evidence
Charles v. State - postconviction relief
Borgio v. Lakeview - real estate contract, breach
Almendral v. J&C - rehearing, rent deposit
Leon v. Lozano - donative intent, evidence
Olivas v. Morales - timesharing, insufficient record
Jackson v. Lawrence - modification of support, insufficient record
Harper v. City of Key Colony Beach - second-tier certiorari, expired permit, fine
Naranjo v. Dep’t of Revenue - insufficient record
Florence v. Dep’t of Corrs - habeas, barred claims
Milton v. State - postconviction relief
McGee v. State - certiorari, competency restoration treatment

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Baldie v. State - downward departure, isolated incident

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Crenshaw v. State - child molestation, new trial
Woods v. Wal-Mart - slip and fall
Lewis v. Norfolk Southern - wrongful death, excluded expert, Daubert
DHSMV v. Begera - second-tier certiorari; driver’s license suspension, substantial evidence
Valenti v. State - Spencer warning, pro se

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Common Wealth Trust v. Polk County - preservation, rehearing
Rushing v. Rushing - marital dissolution, equitable distribution
Jonathan v. State - appellate jurisdiction, withdrawing plea
Grant v. Judd - summary disposition


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.