Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 13-17, 2025

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Guan v. Ellingsworth Res CA - bankruptcy

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


Doty v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Owens v. State - postconviction relief, multiple motions
Davis v. State - mandamus
Hepburn v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Dixon v. State - murder, principal, evidence
Hatcher v. State - use of weapon
Henderson v. Gualtieri - habeas corpus, forfeiting bond

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


McCauley v. State - involuntary intoxication, admissibility
Mendoza v. State - competency, no written order
Carbonell v. Telemundo Television Studios - borrowed employee, immunity
Casanas v. Tandron - temporary injunction, no factual findings
Elitex Program v. Partners & Friends Grp - summary judgment, insufficient evidence
Perez v. Citizens - late notice, presumption of prejudice
Presha v. State - convicted felon status, stipulation
Clark v. Clark - intervention, equitable distribution, waiver
Seduction Cosmetic Ctr v. Dunbar - arbitration clause, interpretation
Mendoza v. VA Crudele Dredging - breach of contract, statute of limitations
Landa v. Briceno - failure to timely effectuate service, dismissal, appellate jurisdiction
Gonzalez v. Henry - timesharing, modification
Montero v. State - return of property, timeliness
Phinney v. Phinney - disqualification of counsel
Engelhardt v. Aronoff - certiorari, discovery, financial information
Bair v. State - certiorari, withdrawal of counsel

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Palm Beach Resurfacing v. Floyd – construction lien; unenforceable contract remedy
Alli v. Sanchez – child support; modification
Meikle v. U-Haul – arbitration; stay; minor; non-contracting party
In re: Name Change of M.T.F. – minor child; name change; best interests evidence

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Rosado v. Samuelsen - paternity, retroactive child support, oral pronouncement
State v. Yanes-Blanco - human smuggling, § 787.07(1)
Bell v. Bell - dissolution, car loan
Gore v. State - concurrence; sentence
Constant v. State - Anders appeal, fine
Rios v. State - ineffective assistance, trial

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland


O'Neil v. State - sentencing, fundamental error


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.