Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of August 24 - 28, 2026
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
USA v. Smith - firearm possession, Second Amendment, sentencing
All Does v. Conrad & Scherer - appellate jurisdiction, collateral orders, attorney charging lien
Acevedo v. Diaz de la Portilla - whistleblower, First Amendment, qualified immunity
Doe v. Carnival - cruise, false imprisonment, sexual assault, evidence, cross-exam
Ellis v. Hillsborough Sheriff - employment, retaliation, Title VII
Burton v. Espino - prisoner, treatment, Eighth Amendment
Jones v. USA - rehearing en banc, vacating this decision
USA v. Miller - robbery by intimidation, evidence
USA v. Thompson - Sixth Amendment, discovery, continuance, search and seizure
In re Fla R App P - amended rule
Fish v. Extreme Enters - workers’ compensation
Carpenter v. State - sentencing
Key Haven v. FDEP - takings, limitations
Ferrari Fin v. Auto Vault - auto lien, notice
Venger v. Reno - timesharing, reunification
Bellamy v. Lee Law - prohibition, judicial disqualification
Russell v. State - grand theft, evidence
Stout v. Cassity - landlord/tenant, evidence, jury interview
Haynes v. State - jail credit
Czyszczon v. Treasure Island - city commissioner, recall proceedings, injunctive relief
Yellowfin Yachts v. Rosen - punitive damages proffer
Rosenberg v. Gerson - probate, non-final order, appellate jurisdiction
Dominguez v. Suarez - partition by sale
Citizens v. Diaz - coverage exclusion, water damage
Galguera v. Avila - inadequate record, injunction
Salussolia v. Nunnari - withdrawal of technical admissions
Shaw v. State - civil commitment, discharge petition
GNU v. Miami-Dade Cnty - exhaustion of administrative remedies
Desir v. State - habeas corpus, “not a second appeal”
Hawkins v. State - postconviction relief
Goldman v. Lewin - punitive damages proffer, probate
Adorno-Cunill & Damas v. Dylewski - certiorari, financial discovery
Neira v. Acosta - child support, criminal contempt
Okaloosa Properties v. Hoffman - tortious interference, litigation privilege
Merco Group v. General Computer - remittitur, unsupported damages
Schmidt v. Stokes - arbitration award, motion to vacate
Gonzalez v. Citizens - coverage, mitigation of loss
Feijoo v. Progressive - PIP benefits, preservation
Jackson v. State - postconviction relief
HeartPoint v. Dragon Blue - reasonable fees, deference to factfinder
Tolipov v. Bojorque - parental timesharing, inadequate record
Alters v. Villoldo - contractual construction
Premier Mitigation v. Citizens - assignment, mitigation of loss
Laplace v. State - six-person jury, threat to injure or kill; prosecution costs
Gonzales v. State - six-person jury, sexual battery, jury question about sentence
Unger v. Unger - disqualified judge, written order, oral pronouncements, remedy
In re Adoption of KE - adoption, § 63.032(16), “consanguinity” definition, construction
Duby v. Marreno - dissent; injunction, stalking, due process
Gardner v. State - first-degree murder, bond hearing, due process
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Rios v. Hawkins - dog adoption, replevin; dismissal, due process, notice
Milburn v. O’Conner - certiorari; writ of possession
MM v. DCF - child, dependent, foster care
BM v. DCF - child, dependent, foster care
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Mensah v. State - postconviction relief
Bowles v. State - costs
Torres v. State - postconviction relief
Gonzalez v. LaGrasse - unauthorized practice
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.