Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of August 31 - September 4, 2026

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Williams v. Ga Regents - Title IX, discrimination, retaliation, whisteblower
Russo v. Commerce - Appointments Clause, fishery management
Filipowski v. IRS - rejection of compromise offer, summary judgment
Pine Hall v. 3M - removal, federal officer
Guthrie v. Coal Bed Servs - Title VII, discrimination, retaliation
Zafirov v. Fla Med Assocs - Appointments Clause, False Claims Act

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


In re Fla R Civ P - amended rules
Conahan v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Loubier v. State - sentencing
Schmidt v. Taylor - personal jurisdiction
Peoples v. State - murder, evidence

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Green v. State - evidence, link to crime, improper prosecution statements
Foster v. State - habeas corpus
Fla Ctr for Gov Account v. Ziegler - public records, Fourth Amendment
FIGA v. Synergy - settlement agreement, enforcement

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Advanced Diagnostic v. Progressive - declaratory judgment standard
Baez v. Quintana - default, inadequate record
Chin v. Fla Dept Rev - inadequate record
S Aircraft v. Miami Exec Aviation - procedural due process
Wright v. JPay - show cause, prohibition of pro se
FIGA v. Simmons - attorney’s fees, settlement, “covered claims”
SCTA v. DCF - adoption, mootness, appellate jurisdiction
Summit v. MSP - venue, forum selection clause
Abukasis v. City First - “emergency” designation, prohibition of pro se
de Armas v. de Armas - quiet title, latent ambiguity
Toledano v. Alvarez - parent-child reunification
Bensimon v. Trust - untimely appeal, summary judgment, final order
Lekas v. Dexer Props - premises, open and obvious danger
Farrington v. Nicolas - certiorari, prohibition of pro se, due process
Fabbro v. Bonetto - shared parental responsibility, ambiguity
Adams v. Adams - vexatious litigant, no show cause order
FDEP v. Miami Beach - premature summary judgment, indemnification
Horne v. State - postconviction relief
Ragan v. State - habeas corpus, premature petition

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Rivera v. Lopes - commenting on excluded evidence
Furno v. Vaughn - dissolution, life insurance
Paul v. State - DUI, burden-shifting
State v. Marlin - DUI, blood draw
Khteeb v. Helcim USA - joint & several liability
Bova View Condo v. Lepselter - prejudgment interest, attorney’s fees
FDLE v. Garcia - sexual offender registry, removal
MK v. Kaplan - child custody
Ramjas v. Gonzalez - dissolution, modification
Hunsicker v. KSV Caastle - default, vacate
MMM v. State - termination, parental rights
Doe v. Pencov - personal jurisdiction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Gerber v. State - sex offender reporting, predicate offense
Grovin Farms v. Intercounty Eng’g - appellate burden, initial brief
Jackson v. State - postconviction relief

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Cruz v. State - hearsay, state-of-mind
Ceqile v. State - postconviction relief
Erskine v. State - postconviction relief
Vega v. Jaramillo - partition, marital property
Liggatt v. Liggatt - nonfinal appellate jurisdiction
Star Mfg v. Leasing Innovations - forum selection clause
Laney v. State - postconviction relief
Wyrick v. Wyrick - parenting plan


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.