Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of February 2 - 6, 2026

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Melton v. I-10 Truck Cntr - employment, Title VII, racial hostility
Castro-Reyes v. Bosque§ 1983, excessive force, qualified immunity, state agent
Doe v. USA - FTCA, childcare, failing to protect
USA v. Holley - evidence, bodycam, sentencing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


Heath v. DOC - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Martinez v. Jinks - appellate jurisdiction, fees without amount
Williams v. State - appellate jurisdiction, sentencing correction

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


DDR v. State - probation revocation
Smith v. State - competency, written order
Brown v. Tampa Gen  - hospital, invitee, trespasser, duty of care
XYZ v. St Pete - historic preservation ordinance, state law preemption
Cedrus Enters v. Jabil - personal jurisdiction

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Lugo-Fernandez v. State - untimely appeal
Jean-Charles v. State - no jury trial waiver
Citizens v. Blanco - anti-concurrent cause
Moskovits v. LP Evans Motors - no arbitration initiation
Vazquez v. Smith - rehearing, attorney’s fees
Altman v. State - law of case, PCA
Palma v. Regions - lien, release, accord and satisfaction
Osorio v. State - burden-shifting remark, breath test
Spartan v. Citizens - assignment of benefits
Stanley v. State - ineffective assistance of counsel
Williams v. Williams - parental responsibility, timesharing, equitable distribution
900 NW 36 St v. Nafisa - rent deposit
Avrahami v. Avrahami - insufficient record
Macauley v. State - rehearing, prior trial testimony admissibility

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


FAU v. Harbor Branch - budget approval, remand
Banks v. Banks - prohibition, disqualification

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Washington v. VyStar Credit - dismissal; breach, account agreement, overdraft fees
Webb v. State - first-degree murder, competence, fundamental error
Mackey v. State - rehearing; interrogating statements, improper opinion
Burress v. Roots and Fruits - fraud, punitive damages, sufficiency  
Laird v. Miao - attorney’s fees, prejudgment interest
Pilak v. Reigel - lost will, rebuttable presumption, destruction
Callwood v. State - postconviction relief

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Lopez v. State - sentencing
Burton v. State - excited utterance hearsay exception
Universal Prop v. Rodriguez - replacement cost evidence
Paez v. Saluscare - confession of error
Conseillant v. State - probation revocation
Six v. State - sentencing, uncharged conduct
Healy v. Arena Wholesale - summary disposition
Pruit Indus v. City Elec - venue selection clause
Nat'l Equity v. Amerifund Equity Grp - unchallenged basis to affirm  


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.