Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of March 23 - 27, 2026

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

 

Joyner v. Atlanta - employment, Title VII, discrimination, retaliation
USA v. Alexander - surgeon, health care kickbacks, venue, evidence, sentencing
Upside Foods v. Fl Dept of Ag - Poultry Products Act, lab-grown meat, preemption

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


All Dry USA v. Savell - discovery sanctions, striking complaint
James v. State - Jimmy Ryce Act
Perez v. State - criminal restitution
JWB v. State - delinquency, disposition
Estes v. Palm Bch Sch Dist - en banc, workers’ compensation, tolling

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Roby v. Roby - marital settlement agreement, contempt
DDR v. State - probation revocation
Page v. State - sentencing
Jordan v. State - continuance, Faretta
Lincolnshire Maximo v. Marina Walk - easement, drainage pipe
Watkins v. Corbett - settlement proposals, conflict
Avesta v. Fred - attorney disqualification, hearing, excluding key witness
Ybor Props v. Tampa - second-tier certiorari, zoning

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Moore v. State - postconviction relief
Yanes-Martel v. State - excluded impeachment
Lowery v. State - jury selection, preservation, concurrence
Escobar v. Citizens - ceiling collapse, coverage
SafePoint v. Ellison - flood damage, coverage
MA v. United - Medicaid coverage
601 Cuda v. Cnty - permit, equitable tolling
Cnty v. Garavan - sovereign immunity, non-economic damages
Martinez v. Bustamante - marital dissolution, parol evidence
Hsu v. Atassi - personal jurisdiction
Zuchaer v. Peninsula - pending discovery, summary judgment
Carnevale v. Shir - counsel disqualification, waiver
Miguel v. Miguel - less restrictive alternative, undue influence
Aderwel v. Aqua Trees - fees, voluntary dismissal
Marckx v. Cumis - inadequate record
Gerome v. State - postconviction relief
Wilson v. State - ineffective assistance
Bonilla v. Sosa - contempt
Vega v. State - pro se mandamus, dismissal
Stevens v. State - postconviction relief
Scott v. Quinn - habeas corpus, dismissal

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Soto v. State - sentencing
Berger-Smith v. State - § 938.27, lab costs
Shamy v. Shovel Ready - unjust enrichment, express contract
Schutz v. Ally - charging lien, third party, indispensable party
Dawkins v. State - double jeopardy
Jupiter v. Armes - attorney’s fees, proposal for settlement, condition
Sable Pass v. Call - HOA approval, chickee hut
Pierre v. SBL Freightliner - dismissal with prejudice, leave to amend
Marvin v. Jones - general release, ambiguity; quiet title; tipsy coachman
Jhelum v. Desmarais - homestead exemption, reverse mortgage line of credit, first impression
Gouveia v. Meridian - AI citations, pro se
Hare v. McLaughlin - certiorari, partial final judgment, stay of execution
GK v. DCF - parental rights, termination

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Star Cas Ins v. Jacksonville Chiropractic - summary judgment, insurance policy, exclusion; attorney’s fees, costs
Hernando Cnty v. McGee & Mason - dismissal, sovereign immunity, four corners
Hodges v. State - false imprisonment, sentencing, fundamental error

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Morrobel v. State - guilty plea, sentencing
Ficka v. Brown - marital dissolution
Rose v. Rose - costs
Bullock v. State - sentencing
Combs v. State - postconviction relief
Luna v. State - consciousness of guilt
Urbina v. Maddox - finality
Wahl v. State - voluntariness of plea


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.