Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of May 18 - 22, 2026
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Marbut v. Phillips - qualified immunity, search and seizure
Bolton v. Coweta Cnty Sheriff - sovereign immunity
T-Mobile v. Roswell - Telecommunications Act, cell service regulation
Great Lakes Ins v. Crabtree - prior dismissals, prejudice
LW v. Ga Dept of Cmty. Health - Medicaid, nursing care
Mobile Baykeeper v. Ala Power - standing, environmental claims, coal ash removal
Wilcox v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
Mendivil v. Fla Bar - mandamus
Reddick v. State - probation violation, sentencing
Priest v. State Farm - insurance, presuit notice
James v. Hernandez - vicarious liability, agent, independent contractor
Norman v. State - postconviction relief
Smith v. Lee - sovereign immunity
Jones v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Lawler v. DOH - administrative review, nursing license suspension
Cosme v. State - evidence, bolstering testimony
Tampa v. Liberty Hosp - appellate jurisdiction, partial final judgment
Hills Cnty Sheriff v. Prahalad - sovereign immunity
Piljevic v. Jankovic - parenting plan
Facundo v. State - amended information, surplusage
Nichols v. French - nonbinding arbitration, trial de novo
Carballo v. State - jury selection, racial bias
Cruz v. Miami - nominal damages
Umana v. MRG Glazing - fees, inadequate record
St Peter & Paul v. Diocese - church property
Wagner v. Nielsen Co - debt, fraudulent transfer
Kuluz v. Monroe Cnty - zoning, new development, driveway
Ferguson v. Trinidad & Tobago - RICO, fees, business records exception
Francois v. State - withdrawal of plea
A-Team v. Fla Peninsula Ins - late notice
Dana Ent v. Tucan & Baru - receivership, dissolution
Fletcher v. Bhangari - service, waiver of defense
SA v. DCF - parental rights termination
Morrison v. Estate of Brown - probate, final distribution
Thomas-McDonald v. Silva - certiorari, ‘cat out of the bag’
Reardon v. RJConsulting - appellate jurisdiction, dismissal
Osorio v. State - mandamus, denied
Maloney v. State - sentencing
Inostroza v. State - ineffective assistance, plea, prejudice
Material Handling v. United Granite - arbitration, attorney’s fees
Dore v. Baptiste - paternity, income, child support
Sturridge v. State - dual-jury procedure, severance
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Ellis v. East Coast Cooling - dismissal, service of process, limitations period, prejudice
Torres-Melendez v. Melendez-Andrade - dissolution, contempt; income deduction orders, attorney’s fees
Beachway Restaurants v. Coquina Beach - commercial lease, conversion, substantial evidence
Stouse v. Stouse - alimony arrearages, contempt, purge amount
Thomas v. Cypress Holdings - dismissal, sanction, Kozel factors, limitations period, prejudice
Green v. DOC - Spencer bar, pro se
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Dunlap v. State - sentencing
State v. Hart - suppression of evidence
Brailsford v. State - sentencing, nonretroactivity
Walker v. State - postconviction relief
Lee County v. Captiva Civic - ultra vires contract, police power
Kings Roofing v. Fusion Works - fabricated citations
Baptiste v. State - sentencing, nonretroactivity
Robinson v. State - sentencing
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.