Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of May 25 - 29, 2026
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Citadel Sec v. SEC - administrative review, trading, latency arbitrage
Khatabi v. Car Auto - sex discrimination, damages caps
Declan Flight v. Textron eAviation - forum non conveniens, personal jurisdiction
USA v. Irons - sentencing
Drummond v. Southern Co Servs - ERISA, payment calculations
Gessner v. Southern - employment, retaliation, Whistle-Blower’s Act
In re Fla R GP&JA - amended rule re AI
Blue Seven v. DOH - administrative review, float tank permit
Madden v. State - evidence, photographs
Le Blanc v. Waters - summary affirmance, punitive damages amendment
Bassett v. Morine - future medical expenses, remittitur
Ramos v. State - postconviction relief
Zielinski v. Palermo - landlord tenant
Kennedy Law Grp v. Uiterwyk - Engle-progeny fee dispute, tortious interference, pleadings
Caputo v. Ploe - vacatur, void order, pending appeal
Schiro v. Elliott - probate, homestead status
Cabezudo v. Cabezudo - pro se sanctions
Gingell v. Panichelli - Applegate affirmance
Londres v. Leid - insufficient record
Wolland v. Wolland - rehearing, attorney’s fees
Major v. Sheriff of Monroe Cnty - unfair labor practice charge
Little v. Bath & Kitchen - attorney’s fees, multiplier
Santaella v. Vaz - certiorari, compulsory medical examination
Wilson v. State - belated appeal, postconviction relief
Universal v. Corniel - directed verdict, evidence
Gelin v. Carrington - foreclosure, standing, relief
Sears v. State - aggravated assault with firearm, evidence
Graham v. Saintil - stalking, injunction
Menocal v. Harrington - confession of error, dismissal of complaint
Barrish v. Interiors - FDUTPA, evidence
Genie v. Citizens - confession of error, certiorari, taxable costs
Mesamours v. State - resisting, evidence, peremptory challenge, twelve-person jury
Brewer v. State - illegal sentence
Petterson-Grifith v. State - battery, evidence
Foster v. Jimenez - directed verdict, evidence
Cochran v. State - illegal sentence
Richburg-Smith v. Nkrumah - will, validity
Bradshaw v. State - postconviction relief
Jhaveri v. Rivas - corporate veil
Kuehne v. OJ Commerce - PFS, choice of law
Ceglio v. Womer - statement of claim, extension
Medders v. State - double jeopardy
Innocent v. Meraki - transcript quotations
Weiss v. Abraham - attorney’s fees, ward
Davis v. Geo Group - failure to challenge grounds
Owens v. Albrecht - arbitration
Avery v. Beauzil - pro se sanctions
Eclectic Synergy - disqualification, sanctions
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
St Pierre v. State Farm - homeowner’s insurance, notice, § 627.70152, retroactivity
Trusteebiz v. El Ladki - intervention, vacate judgment; certiorari, irreparable harm
Law v. Williams - personal representative, surcharge, substantial evidence
Smith-Fullerton v. Fullerton - disqualification, trial counsel, former judge
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
State v. Bounds - suppression of evidence
White v. State - sentencing
Lowe v. State - sentencing
Alexander v. Capital One - default judgment
Greager v. DOH - jurisdiction, administrative appeals
Langley v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure sale
Bradley v. DOR - child support
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.