Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of September 14 - 18, 2026

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

USA v. Gibbs - search and seizure
Mueller v. Walmart - supplemental jurisdiction, state law claims
Martin v. Ala DOC - habeas corpus

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee


Smiley v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee


Sampson v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness

Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg


Baker v. State - citation dissent
Progressive v. Reinberger - future medical expenses, speculation, directed verdict
Himmelein v. State - 12-person jury
Holdings JJJ v. Rand - arbitration
Gutierrez-Toledo v. State - 12-person jury
Smith v. State - probation revocation
Macchitelli v. Gaffney - appellate jurisdiction, fee sanction without amount
Sussman v. Kangas - duty of candor, disguised settlement
Kohn v. Diedrich - new trial request, common law standard, preservation
Hernandez v. State - postconviction relief
Miller v. State - habeas corpus

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Curry v. State - habitual felony offender, jury
Valdes v. Est of Capetillo - attorney’s fees
Quiet Tech v. Grp E - contract, repudiation
Bonczyk v. Wolfe - pro se filings
Westbrook v. State - postconviction relief
Lai v. Shen - insufficient record
Pino v. State - DUI, traffic stop
Keller v.  Keller - domestic violence, injunction
Leal v. State - certiorari, commitment to DCF

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach


Bell v. Konidaris - probate, attorney’s fees
Rost v. Textor - FSIPA, misrepresentation
Alexander Marine v. Fubon Ins - forum-selection
Francois v. Executive Towing - statutory lien
Boynton Beach v. Pierre - Public Whistleblower Act, noneconomic damages
Arreguin v. State - sentencing
Lisandrillo v. Palozzi - AI slop

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Misner v. State - postconviction relief
Shaltouki v. MA Ventures - writ of prohibition, jurisdiction

Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Berntsen v. Santopietro - stalking injunction
Smith v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Collins v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Pringle v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Wilson v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Crews v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Johnson v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Kafus v. State - probation
Laboy v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Aguilar v. Aguilar - attorneys’ fees, ripeness
Butler v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Rosario v. State - sentencing
Cantrell v. State - prohibition, statute of limitations


The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.

Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.