Florida Appeals Court Decisions Week of September 28 - October 2, 2026
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
Tate v. Ga Diag & Class Prison - next friend habeas corpus
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
In re Fla R Crim P - amended rule, pretrial motions
In re Fla R Civ P - amended rules, various
In re Fla R Civ P - amended rule, signing discovery
In re Fla Prob R - amended rules, various
In re Fla Prob R - amended rules, death evidence
In re Fla R Civ P - amended rules, various
In re Fla R App P - amended rule, fees
Jewell v. State - murder, unattended child in vehicle
Litai Assets v. DFS - administrative subpoenas, DFS authority
Weber v. State - sentencing
Chinchar v. State - sentencing
Zakarian v. DBPR - license revocation
Bass v. State - 12-person jury
Gerow v. Schrock - stalking injunction
Wolfe v. Martinez - prohibition, repeat violence injunction
Hunt v. State - restitution, hearsay
Feijoo v. Progressive - EUO, prejudice
Sorensen v. Citizens - preservation, rehearing, appraisal
Mercado v. State - search, inevitability
B.M. v. Miami Dade Cnty Sch Bd - zero-tolerance policy, exceptions
Rosado v. Am Storm - pleading, amendments
Taw v. State - probation revocation, impermissible considerations
State v. Hernandez - sex offender registration requirement, remove
Carson v. InteRebar - economic duress, set-off
Johnson v. State - ineffective assistance, prior felon, stipulation
Lebarr v. State - postconviction relief
Olivo v. State - sentence, impermissible considerations
Berrouet v. NM Auction - certiorari, striking expert witnesses, late disclosure
Cabrera v. Cabrera - certiorari, CME
Santos v. Western Funding - dismissal, lack of prosecution, due diligence
Doe v. Doe - certiorari, deposition
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Zoldan v. Entrada - conversion, real property
Benedetto v. Exp Realty - punitive damages, amendment, intentional misconduct
North Palm Motors v. Custom Fleet - trade secrets, damages, attorney’s fees
Fla Ins Guaranty v. Restore All - default judgment, rule 1.500, attorney appearance
Nat’l Ins USA v. MAPP Digital - attorney’s fees, costs, offer of judgment, § 57.105(7)
Goshay v. State - search and seizure, traffic stop, textualism, context
Baron v. Baron - marital dissolution, due process, trial length
Louis v. State - criminal prosecution, “superstition,” lay witness testimony
Lugo v. State - sentencing
Mohammed v. Ali - parenting plan, medical treatment for child, delegating authority
Baker Donaldson v. Bedeschi America - legal malpractice, personal jurisdiction
Jimenez v. Jimenez - termination of timesharing, due process
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Holliday v. State - seizure, suspect, 911 call, description
Ganga v. State - concession of error; due process, resentencing, murder, battery
Long and Scott Farms v. Lake Jem Farms - amended pleading, superseding
Florio v. FIGA - homeowners’ insurance, FIGA statutory cap, directed verdict
Finley v. State - Anders appeal, corrected judgment
TR v. DCF - Spencer bar, pro se
AC v. State - indirect criminal contempt, clear and precise order
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Letteri v. Safepoint - confession of judgment
Wilson v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Abreu v. State - probable cause
Jackson v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Desir v. BMO Harris Bank - preservation
Progressive v. Holms - interlocutory appeal
Patterson v. State - Apprendi, postconviction relief
Lawrence v. Rockridge - timeliness, certiorari jurisdiction
DCF v. MV - custody
The provided links above may be available for a limited time only, as courts sometimes relocate opinions on their websites. Should that occur, please use the “written opinions archive” links provided below each court header to search for the opinion using the case name. The availability of opinions through these channels may vary and is subject to the discretion of the courts.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.