Skip to Content

New York Court of Appeals Affirms GBL § 349 and § 350 Claims Must Have Widespread Effect on Consumers

Twenty-five years ago, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that a claim under General Business Law section 349 does not lie when the plaintiff alleges only "a private contract dispute over policy coverage and the processing of a claim which is unique to the[] parties, not conduct which affects the consuming public at large." N.Y. Univ. v. Cont'l Ins. Co., 87 N.Y.2d 308, 321 (1995). Recently, the court was asked a different question: where an insurance contract, negotiated by sophisticated parties, is provided as one of several health insurance policies from which hundreds of thousands of employees and retirees can select, has the insurance company engaged in "consumer-oriented conduct" under sections 349 and 350? In Plavin v. Group Health Inc., the Court of Appeals answered: yes, the marketing actions of the health insurer are consumer-oriented, as they potentially affect hundreds of thousands of similarly situated consumers.

Sections 349 and 350 make unlawful any deceptive acts or practices or false advertising in the conduct of any business, trade or commerce or in the furnishing of any service in New York. During open enrollment, New York City employees and retirees could select only one of the 11 previously negotiated health insurance plans offered as part of their compensation and retirement packages. Although the underlying insurance contract was negotiated between the city and each health insurer, the insurers were able to market their health care plans directly to the employees and retirees. The appellant alleged that Group Health Inc.'s website contained "misleading benefit and coverage summaries" in its marketing materials during open enrollment, inducing consumers to select GHI's health insurance plan and pay additional premiums for an allegedly worthless out-of-network rider.

Relying on past precedent, the court found that "by providing a choice of 11 options, the City created a health insurance marketplace for its approximately 600,000 employees and retirees, who were not direct parties to the contracts negotiated between the City and insurance vendors. GHI's summary materials, prepared and edited solely by GHI, contained the only information provided to City employees and retirees when determining whether to select GHI's Plan. Under these circumstances, we hold that the complaint adequately alleged consumer-oriented conduct."

Authored By
Related Industries
Property & Casualty Insurance
©2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.