Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Real Property & Title Insurance Update: Week Ending March 25, 2016

REAL PROPERTY UPDATE

  • Ad Valorem Taxation: lessee holding 99-year leasehold interest in unimproved land owned by government entity is not “equitable owner” and thus not liable for ad valorem property taxes pursuant to sec. 196.199, Fla. Stat. (2011) – Island Resorts Investments, Inc. v. Jones, No. 1D15-2916 (Fla. 1st DCA Mar. 21, 2016) (reversed and remanded)
  • Foreclosure: lender not entitled to final judgment of foreclosure where trial evidence insufficient to establish cause of action, especially where no note, mortgage, or allonge introduced into evidence – 66 Team LLC v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 3D15-1140 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 23, 2016) (reversed and remanded)
  • Foreclosure: involuntary dismissal of foreclosure action improper where granted prior to completion of lender’s case in chief  – Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co. v. Altos Del Mar LLC, Nos. 3D15-1647 (Fla. 3d DCA Mar. 23, 2016) (reversed and remanded)
  • Foreclosure: where bank’s corporate representative’s knowledge of how bank became holder of note limited to what representative learned from search on internet, involuntary dismissal proper– Sosa v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Nos. 4D14-810 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 23, 2016) (reversed and remanded)
  • Foreclosure: lender not entitled to final judgment of foreclosure where it did not put on any competent evidence at trial to show it was holder of note at filing of complaint – Cruz v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 4D14-3799 (Fla. 4th DCA Mar. 23, 2016) (reversed)
  • Foreclosure: borrower entitled to involuntary dismissal where bank presented no evidence it was holder of note at the time complaint filed – Devries v. Citimortgage Inc., No. 5D14-1887 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 24, 2016) (reversed and remanded)

TITLE INSURANCE UPDATE

  • Insured: when insured mortgagee assigns the note and mortgage, the assignee becomes the insured under the title insurance policy, and the original mortgagee loses its status as insured and retains only the ability to recover for any loss during the course of its ownership - JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Trustee v. Stewart Title Ins. Co., No. 8115/11 (Supr. N.Y.  March 14, 2016) (denying motion for leave to amend to add additional plaintiff and granting motion for summary judgment)
  • Statute of Limitations: plaintiff who has assigned the note and mortgage and has not sustained damages lacks standing to bring an action on a title insurance policy and may not join assignee as an additional plaintiff where the statute of limitations on assignee’s claim has run - JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Trustee v. Stewart Title Ins. Co., No. 8115/11 (Sup. N.Y.  March 14, 2016) (denying motion for leave to amend to add additional plaintiff and granting motion for summary judgment)
  • Title Company: buyer has no claim under state or federal law for contract that gives buyer a financial incentive to use a designated title company but does not require buyer to use the designated company –Wenig Saltiel LLP v. Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC, No. 003825 (N.Y. March 4, 2016) (order granting motion to dismiss)
  • Trial: court order striking trial date and partially “staying” proceedings pending mediation and discovery did not toll California statutory 5 year period of time for case to be brought to trial – Gaines v. Fidelity National Title Ins. Co., No. S215990 (Sup. Ct. Cal. Feb. 25, 2016) (affirming dismissal)
  • Agency Agreement: breach of agency agreement was not barred by statute of limitations or laches absent prejudice despite long delay – Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co. v. Sienna Abstract, LLC, No. 2014-09382 (Supr. N.Y.  Feb. 24, 2016) (affirming order granting motion to amend complaint)
  • Negligent Misrepresentation: affirming defense judgment on negligent misrepresentation claim – Arjune v. Commonwealth Land Title Ins. Co., No. 2015-02304 (Supr. N.Y. March 23, 2016)(affirming order granting summary judgment)
  • E&O: title insurer’s suit against title agent not covered under illegal profit exclusion but same exclusion did not bar title agent’s principal’s claim under same E&O policy – National Title Agency, LLC v. United Nation Ins. Co., No. 2:15-cv-160 (D. Utah March 21, 2016) (memorandum decision and order granting in part, denying in part motion for summary judgment)
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.