Skip to Content

Insurer Notches Administrative Procedure Act Win

An insurer has prevailed on its claim that the government violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by issuing a bulletin designed to put it out of business.

Brisk Insurance Services LLC supplies specialized software through approved insurance providers (AIPs) who sell crop insurance policies under the Federal Crop Insurance Act.  The Department of Agriculture’s Risk Management Agency (RMA) issued a bulletin effectively prohibiting Brisk’s business model.

Brisk challenged the bulletin under the APA. The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia agreed with Brisk that the RMA’s adoption of the bulletin violated the APA. The court explained that the “bulletin was designed to end Brisk’s business, and RMA issued it without considering Brisk’s views.” The court found that “arbitrary and capricious.” It set the bulletin aside. In so doing, it noted that it took “no position on whether Brisk’s business model should be sustained in the federal crop insurance industry,” “[b]ut it is axiomatic that agency action must comport with the ADA, and RMA’s bulletin d[id] not.”

Brisk Insurance Services LLC v. Federal Crop Insurance Corp., No. 1:26-cv-00842 (D.D.C. July 29, 2026).

Authored By
Related Practices
Reinsurance
©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.