Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

CFTC Issues Double No-Action for CFCs

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission responded favorably to an Investment Company Institute no-action request regarding the reporting obligations of commodity pool operators (CPOs) of SEC-registered funds (funds) and their wholly-owned and controlled foreign subsidiaries (CFCs) under Regulations 4.27 and 4.22. The relief, granted on September 5, 2013, is motivated by, and its "Compliance Date" is linked to that of, the CFTC’s recent rule harmonizing its compliance regime with the SEC’s.

Absent this relief, CFTC Regulation 4.27(c) would require CPOs that trade commodities through CFCs to file separate quarterly reports for the CFCs on Form CPO-PQR with the National Futures Association. The relief generally removes the need to file such separate reports, if (a) consolidated reports for the fund are filed that include the relevant data for its CFSs and (b) the CPO either:

  • consolidates the financial statements of the fund and its CFCs, or
  • is working on converting to such consolidated financial statements (although this latter alternative is available only for an interim period and if certain other significant conditions are met).

The no-action relief also generally permits the omission of separate annual reports that Regulation 4.22(c) otherwise would require to be filed with respect to a CFC, if consolidated annual reports for the fund are filed that (a) contain consolidated audited statements of the fund and (b) separately note the holdings, gains, losses, and other financial statement information for the CFC.

In order to rely on the September 5 letter, a CPO must file a claim via email with the CFTC, and the letter sets forth several requirements for such claims. Whether a fund will need the relief will depend on whether it uses any CFCs, notwithstanding the negative attitude of the Internal Revenue Service toward treating such subsidiaries’ investment results as contributing to a fund’s compliance with Sub-Chapter M of the Internal Revenue Code.

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.