Menu

Courts Continue to Wrestle with TCPA Consent

Consumer Finance   |   March 31, 2014
Download   
Share Page

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) prohibits non-emergency calls to cell phones using automatic telephone dialing systems or prerecorded voice messages absent the called party’s prior express consent. Text messages are treated as calls under the statute.

In Gager v. Dell Financial Services, LLC, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court decision to hold that a consumer can revoke prior express consent, for purposes of the TCPA, to be called at a number previously provided in writing to a creditor, and that there is no temporal limitation on the customer’s right to revoke consent. Since Gager, which was decided in August of last year, the issues of consent, and whether it may be revoked, continue to arise in TCPA cases.

Relying on Gager, the federal district court in the Southern District of Florida ruled revocation of consent was sufficiently alleged for purposes of bringing suit for violating the TCPA. The consumer initially signed up for text message alerts but later took steps to stop them by following the company’s instructions for unsubscribing to text messages.

In another text message alert case, Baird v. Sabre, Inc., a California federal district court ruled that a consumer gave consent under the TCPA when she entered her cell phone number while booking an online airline ticket. In reaching this decision, the Baird court concluded that this situation was covered by the FCC’s original rules implementing the TCPA (often referred to in TCPA cases as the 1992 FCC Final Order). Accordingly, based on the 1992 FCC Final Order, the court found the consumer "knowingly release[d]" her cell phone number to the airlines when she entered it while booking her online reservation. The court rejected the argument that the number was not voluntarily released simply because the airline required a contact telephone number to make the reservation.


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.