Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

Skip to Content

Variable Annuities Still in the Crosshairs

For the first time in several years, variable annuities are not listed as a priority in FINRA’s annual letter of regulatory and examination priorities. The omission from the January 2, 2014, letter may be partly due to the steady decline in the number of FINRA arbitration cases involving variable annuities—from 300 in 2009, to 174 in 2013—according to FINRA’s website.

Nevertheless, FINRA head Richard Ketchum continues to pointedly refer to variable annuities as a FINRA focus. And, the SEC Office of Investor Education and Advocacy issued a February 6 investor bulletin addressing what an investor should do before purchasing a variable annuity.

Moreover, a significant proportion of qualified plan "rollovers" (principally from 401(k) plans to IRAs) involve variable annuities, and there are multiple indications that regulators are targeting those transactions. Such indications include:

  • Prominent discussion of rollovers as a priority in FINRA’s January 2, 2014, letter.
  • FINRA’s issuance during 2013 of two regulatory notices addressing concerns about financial advisers who encourage employees to roll over their qualified plan assets into IRAs without adequate disclosure or suitability analysis.
  • A January 9, 2014 annual examination priorities letter issued by the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) that prominently announced plans to examine the sales practices of investment advisers and broker-dealers who target retirement-age workers to roll over their 401(k) plan assets into higher cost investments. OCIE’s focus will include possible improper or misleading marketing, conflicts of interest, and suitability issues related to such transactions.
  • A 2013 GAO report entitled "401(k) Plans: Labor and IRS Could Improve the Rollover Process for Participants" that also expressed concerns about advisers who do not adequately explain all available options or make suitability determinations.

With focus on rollovers coming from so many directions, variable annuity issuers may feel like they have a target on their back.

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.