Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Broker-Dealers File Suspiciously Few Suspicious Activity Reports
June 15, 2015

Speaking at an anti-money laundering (AML) conference in February, SEC Director of Enforcement John Ceresney warned attendees that broker-dealers were under-filing suspicious activity reports (SARs). He said that broker-dealers in the United States have been averaging only about five SARs each year per firm, despite a high volume of transactions that warrant more such filings, with many broker-dealers filing none.

Promising that the SEC would pursue "stand-alone" violations (i.e., where the only alleged violation is failure to file a required SAR), Ceresney cited a recent SEC enforcement action against broker-dealer Oppenheimer, which aided a customer who engaged in large deposits and sales of penny stocks. While Oppenheimer AML compliance personnel detected a suspicious transfer, the firm filed no SAR.

In another example, amidst potential wash-trading and other forms of suspicious manipulation, a Wedbush Securities executive failed to file an SAR.

Noteworthy takeaways:

  • Broker-dealers will be under increased SEC scrutiny for under-filing SARs for the foreseeable future.
  • Emphasis will be made on how well broker-dealers are discharging their obligation to file meaningful and substantive SARs, rather than just "check the box" SARs that inadequately describe the suspicious activity.
  • As a former federal prosecutor from the Southern District of New York, Ceresney and the SEC’s point people who bring these enforcement actions will likely select readily provable cases where the evidence is strong and the defenses weak.
  • The SEC will be pursuing "stand-alone" Bank Secrecy Act enforcement actions—such as those mentioned above—to send a message that the SEC considers SAR violations in and of themselves to be serious and that the under-filing must stop.
  • An SEC broker-dealer task force will be looking at other options to increase compliance with a broker-dealers’ obligation to file SARs.
Authored By
Image: Edward J. Page
Edward J. Page
Related Practices
Securities Litigation and Enforcement
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.