Menu

Global Regulators Evolve on Money Manager Systemic Risks

Securities and Derivative Litigation   |   September 28, 2015
Download   
Share Page

The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) in June made an important recommendation concerning any risks that investment funds and advisors present to the global financial system. Specifically, it concluded that a full review of asset management activities and products in a broad global context should be the immediate focus of international efforts to address such "systemic" risks.

IOSCO also plays a role in the ongoing systemic risk initiatives of the Financial Stability Board, an international standards-setting body established by the G20 countries. Indeed, in July the FSB’s chairman signaled a move toward IOSCO’s position, saying, "The thinking of the FSB is that we will address issues around activities first and then take an assessment if there’s any residual risk."

Previously, the FSB has focused more on developing standards for designating certain individual funds and advisers as presenting global systemic risks and subjecting them to additional, potentially bank-like regulation. Many in the United States have strenuously criticized this concept of imposing systemic risk designations on funds or advisers, arguing that any such risks would be much better addressed through industry-wide measures developed by the entities’ primary regulators. That, for example, has been the SEC’s view. Indeed, the SEC proposals discussed in "SEC Proposes Major Disclosure Changes for Funds and Advisers" on page 12 aim to identify and monitor for such risks. Accordingly, the SEC, which is a member of both IOSCO and the FSB, may be an influence on those organizations’ developing positions.

Likewise, Federal Reserve Board Governor Daniel Tarullo may have an impact in his capacity as Chairman of the FSB’s Standing Committee on Supervisory and Regulatory Cooperation. Recently, Tarullo reportedly expressed a preference for an approach similar to what the FSB now espouses.

The developing thinking of the FSB may, in turn, have at least some influence on the approach that its U.S. counterpart (the Financial Stability Oversight Council) develops for identifying and addressing any risks that investment funds or advisers present to the U.S. financial system.


©2019 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.