Menu

Stripping of Unsecured Second Mortgages in Chapter 7 Bankruptcies in the Crosshairs

Consumer Finance   |   Real Estate   |   Creditors’ Rights and Bankruptcy   |   March 25, 2015
Download   
Share Page

Since its 1989 opinion in Folendore v. Small Business Admin., the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has allowed debtors to completely strip off and void wholly unsecured junior liens in Chapter 7 bankruptcies under Section 506(d) of the Bankruptcy Code. Complete lien stripping forever prevents creditors from seeking relief against a debtor’s collateral if it is underwater, even if the property value later increases. Since Chapter 7 debtors are also discharged of personal liability, subordinate debt is, in such cases, rendered worthless.

That may soon change.

The Eleventh Circuit’s position on lien stripping conflicts with that of the Fourth, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits – the only federal Courts of Appeal to have addressed the issue. Now the Supreme Court appears ready to resolve the conflict, accepting certiorari review of two Eleventh Circuit cases dealing with the issue.

Most commentators expect the Supreme Court to side with the Fourth, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits and hold unsecured junior liens may not be stripped in Chapter 7 cases; it has, after all, already held, post-Folendore, that debtors may not partially strip down undersecured subordinate liens, reasoning that if a claim "is secured by a lien with recourse to the underlying collateral, [it cannot be stripped under] § 506(d)… [because] the creditor’s lien stays with the real property until foreclosure [as this] is what was bargained for by the mortgagor and the mortgagee."

Even the Eleventh Circuit has signaled it may reconsider the issue. In a recent opinion affirming the stripping of an unsecured second mortgage, the panel acknowledged that the Supreme Court has "rejected the reasoning of [its prior holding in] Folendore" but noted the court was bound by the prior panel precedent rule until reversed on appeal en banc or by the Supreme Court. The court then invited the creditor to seek en banc review of its own decision.

In response, debtors in the Eleventh Circuit have expedited their efforts to strip off underwater subordinate debt before the Supreme Court addresses the issue. Some debtors are even attempting to reopen long dormant cases to seek such relief. In such instances, home equity lenders and other debt holders, who have historically abandoned subordinate claims given the grim prospects of recovery, should reevaluate their position. Loans once considered worthless may be given new life by the Supreme Court in the coming months. Until a final ruling on the issue is reached, creditors should seek to stay enforcement of orders allowing subordinate liens to be stripped in Chapter 7 cases.


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.