Skip to Content

SEC Probes Share Class Recommendations

In July, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) announced an initiative to identify instances where registered investment advisers may be improperly influenced by conflicts of interests when they decide what class of mutual fund or Section 529 plan shares to recommend to their retail clients.

OCIE is focused particularly on conflicts that may exist when an adviser recommends a share class that has “substantial” loads or distribution fees, and

  • undisclosed compensation or incentives are being paid to the adviser or its associated person or affiliate. For example, if the adviser (or its affiliate) is a registered broker-dealer, they may be receiving compensation in that capacity; or
  • a less costly share class is available that would have provided less compensation/incentives to the adviser or to its associated person or other affiliate.

Accordingly, OCIE says its initiative will focus on questions such as:

  • whether the adviser’s share class recommendations comply with the adviser’s duty to seek “best execution” and otherwise act in the clients’ best interest;
  • whether the adviser (a) has satisfied all of Form ADV’s disclosure requirements relating to compensation and (b) more generally, has made “full and fair disclosure of all material facts, including all material conflicts of interest that could affect the advisory relationship”; and
  • whether the adviser’s written compliance policies and procedures are adequate and effective, as relevant to share class recommendations.

Some variable annuity contracts make available more than one “share class.” Although OCIE’s announcement did not address the question, it is prudent to assume that SEC staff would find recommendations concerning such variable annuity share classes present issues similar to those outlined above.

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.