Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

SEC Scrutinizes Multi-Manager Arrangements
September 26, 2017

Many mutual funds implement their investment strategies through "multi-manager" (also called "manager of manager") arrangements, particularly funds used to support variable life insurance and annuity products. Among other things, these arrangements allow a fund’s primary investment adviser to efficiently replace underperforming sub-advisers without shareholder approval.

The SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) appears to have recently commenced examinations of the multi-manager activities of a number of fund advisers. For example, the information request OCIE sent to at least one fund group suggests the examination staff intends to closely scrutinize a range of issues, such as:

  • compliance with applicable exemptive and no-action relief, including whether the overall arrangement and any material changes to the primary investment advisory contract were properly approved by fund shareholders
  • the rationale for hiring and firing sub-advisers, including related fund board materials
  • whether fund shareholders were properly notified when new sub-advisers are hired
  • potential conflicts, including in relation to the use of sub-advisers affiliated with the primary adviser and fee renegotiations with existing sub-advisers
  • the rationale and process for reallocating assets between sub-advisers
  • the effectiveness of the oversight of the primary adviser and sub-advisers
  • the fund board’s process for determining if fund counsel is "independent"
  • the impact of the hiring or firing of sub-advisers on the primary adviser’s profitability

While most of these issues will not surprise those familiar with the compliance aspects of multi-manager arrangements, they suggest the SEC staff will be especially focused on potential conflicts in this round of examinations. Take, for instance, the staff’s interest in the primary adviser’s profitability in relation to the hiring and firing of sub-advisers. All the same, now may be a good time for funds and fund advisers to review their multi-manager arrangements for compliance with applicable federal securities laws.
Authored By
Image: Edmund J. Zaharewicz
Edmund J. Zaharewicz
Related Practices
Financial Services Regulatory
Related Industries
Life, Annuity, and Retirement Solutions Securities & Investment Companies
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.