Menu

Expect Focus Life Insurance, September 2018

FINRA Targets Variable Annuity Practices

Insurance   |   Financial Services Regulatory   |   Life Insurance & Financial Lines   |   Securities & Investment Companies   |   Securities Transactions and Compliance   |   October 1, 2018
Download   
Share Page

FINRA’s reported enforcement actions as to certain variable annuity practices increased in 2018. For example, FINRA announced more than half a dozen settlements – via Letters of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWCs) – for broker-dealers’ failures to meet their obligations in connection with their customers’ exchanges from one variable annuity to another.

One such AWC imposed various sanctions on a firm for failing to implement a reasonable supervisory system and procedures to determine if any of its registered representatives had inappropriately high rates of variable annuity exchanges. Specifically, the broker-dealer selected for review only a limited number of its representatives based on criteria unrelated to their volume of variable annuity recommendations and not designed to determine if the representatives had problematic rates of exchanges. Interestingly, the AWC did not indicate that the firm’s representatives had, in fact, improperly recommended any exchanges.

Another AWC was based on FINRA’s review of a 250-case sample set of a broker-dealer’s documentation of the information provided to customers relative to whether a recommended variable annuity exchange would be in the customer’s interest. FINRA concluded that, in a high percentage of these samples, material misrepresentations were made to the customers and that, in many cases, they made the recommended exchanges look more favorable to the customer. Accordingly, the AWC imposed various sanctions on the firm for making negligent misstatements and omissions, failing to have a reasonable basis for recommendations, and failure to implement adequate surveillance and supervisory procedures.

In recent months, FINRA has also published several AWCs imposing a range of sanctions on broker-dealers for inadequate supervisory procedures and training for the sale of multi-share class variable annuities. Typically, such AWCs focus on the suitability concerns raised by the sale of L-share annuity contracts that have shorter surrender charge periods and higher ongoing charges than other share classes, if issued under circumstances that include, for example, the presence of certain types of “living benefit” riders, suggesting that the customer has a longer-term orientation.

Accordingly, issuers and distributors should be mindful that FINRA is continuing its historical enforcement focus on variable annuities, particularly as to exchanges and L-share contracts.

 

©2018 Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.