Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Not Quite Across the Suitability Finish Line
September 03, 2020
While everyone may be growing weary, the work to revise the state insurance standard of care for annuity transaction recommendations is not quite finished. There are still a number of miles left on this marathon run, as follows:

  • State adoption of revisions to their suitability requirements to conform to the 2020 revisions to the NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation #275.
  • Drafting NAIC frequently asked questions guidance to states and industry.
  • Drafting revisions to the NAIC Market Regulation Handbook.

Except for Iowa and Arizona, the remaining states have yet to make revisions to their suitability requirements to conform to the 2020 NAIC Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation #275. During the Annuity Suitability Working Group’s (“Suitability WG”) July 29 call:

  • Idaho reported that updates to its suitability requirements have been submitted to the legislature to be discussed during the January 2021 session.
  • Kentucky advised that it is required by state law to review its suitability regulation this year and plans to update its suitability language in August.
  • Ohio noted that it expects to start the legislative process in August or September with a target date of January 1, 2021.
  • Rhode Island noted that it is in the preliminary phases of preparing suitability regulation for review.

On August 17, Michigan introduced House Bills 6112, 6113, 6114, and 6115 to update its state suitability requirements. Other states are believed to be in the process of updating their suitability requirements.

As part of its charge to promote greater uniformity across NAIC-member jurisdictions, the Suitability WG is preparing an FAQ. A draft has been exposed for comment, and the Suitability WG anticipates discussing comments during a September meeting. To cheer the states across the finish line, the draft NAIC FAQ reminds the states that they need to work toward adopting the 2020 revisions for section 989J of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (commonly called the “Harkin amendment”) that apply to the sale of certain non-SEC registered insurance products.

As the 2020 revisions are being adopted by the states, the NAIC will need to update its Market Regulation Handbook to revise the standards for conducting a suitability examination. Work has not yet started on this effort.

 
Authored By
Image: Ann Young Black
Ann Young Black
Related Practices
Financial Services Regulatory
Related Industries
Life, Annuity, and Retirement Solutions Securities & Investment Companies
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.