Skip to Content

SEC Gives Enforcement Manual an Overdue Physical

We recently reported that SEC Chairman Paul Atkins had prescribed new procedures for the agency’s Wells submission process: i.e., more time for and more transparency to potential defendants’ counsel, and more meaningful engagement between enforcement staff and counsel. SeeSEC Chairman Drops His Remix of Wells Process,” Expect Focus – Life, Annuity, and Retirement Solutions (January 2026). On February 24, 2026, the SEC’s Division of Enforcement published the first update to its Enforcement Manual since 2017, thus formalizing these and other reforms.

The most significant changes to the manual relate to the Wells process. Now, respondents will receive four weeks to prepare a Wells submission (an increase from two weeks), and the division must schedule a post-submission meeting between defense counsel and senior SEC leadership at the associate director level or above within four weeks of receiving the submission. And for the first time, the manual provides explicit guidance for an effective Wells submission, including:

  • Referring accurately to the relevant evidence and applicable precedents.
  • Acknowledging the staff’s position while highlighting exculpatory evidence.
  • Focusing on disputed factual or legal issues.
  • Addressing litigation risks.
  • Supporting key arguments with citations to the investigative record.

Where pending charges are particularly complex or technical, the manual also now permits counsel to submit an expert report.

Moreover, the updated manual administers a dose of clarity to the settlement process. The SEC has restored its practice of simultaneously considering settlement offers alongside related waiver requests: No longer must a party resolve an action and only later learn the collateral consequences of doing so. Staff must now present the settlement offer and waiver request together for the SEC’s consideration, giving settling parties a complete diagnostic picture before they commit to a resolution.

Other noteworthy updates include a formalization of “white paper” submissions (which will be capped at 40 pages) and the inclusion of offchannel ommunications (such as iMessage, WhatsApp, and Signal) within the definition of “document” for both subpoena and document preservation purposes. And, to provide closure to parties who cooperated and were not ultimately charged, SEC staff are encouraged to send termination letters if such a party made significant productions in an investigation. The division also has committed to give the manual an annual review, signaling that further refinements may follow.

For companies and individuals under SEC scrutiny, the updated manual signals a meaningful shift in the division’s behavior: the exam has been standardized, the instruments have been calibrated, and the bedside manners have been

©2026 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.