Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 11 - 15, 2019
February 16, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Pitch v. US - disclosure of grand jury records
US v. Valois - MDLEA
Hillcrest Prop v. Pasco Cnty - due process, land use
US v. Caniff - child pornography
Democratic Exec Cmte of Fla v. Fla Atty Gen - emergency stay

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Byram v. State - double jeopardy
Welch v. Inch - vexatious litigant
Terrill v. State - sentencing
Rodriguez-Lopez v. State - plea withdrawal
Amalgam'd Trans v. Local 1579 - certiorari; arbitration; certified conflict
Mickles v. State - postconviction relief
Brown v. State - postconviction relief
Tisdale v. Tisdale - MSA; child support
Wade v. State - counsel conflict; Williams rule
State v. Choice Plus - administrative jurisdiction, fees
Cassedy v. Wood - attorney's fees, agreement, settlement proposal
Rente v. Orange Cnty - workers' compensation
Barakat v. Barakat Food Store - service of regulatory complaint
State v. Bohler - new trial, weight of evidence
EW v. State - delinquency, school trespass

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Culver v. State - plea withdrawal
McDonald V. State - probation revocation
Grady v. State - probation revocation
Caruso v. State - trial court jurisdiction pending appeal
Hernandez v. State - juror challenge, preservation of error

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Mendez v. State - molestation; uncharged crime evidence
Cancino v. Cancino - marital dissolution, indirect criminal contempt
Simmons v. State - sentencing
Escalona Socarras v. Bazan Vassallo - equitable distribution, marital assets
Feuer v. Ivanov - summary affirmance
JR v. State - evidence, high crime area
Benzrent v. Wilmington Sav - foreclosure, default, standing
State v. Lorenzo - postconviction relief
Air Shunt v. Airfoil - personal jurisdiction
Ultra Aviation v. Cruz Clemente - employment, local wage ordinance
Biscayne Marine v. Miami - second-tier certiorari; bid protest
Asset Recovery v. Wright - prohibition; receiver's authority to act
Planas v. State - rule 3.800(a) limitations

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Pansky v. Pansky - s. 605.0503, charging order, LLC
Randall v. State - manslaughter, principal to crime
RJ Reynolds v. Thomas - comparative fault reduction, remedy
McDonald v. State - uncharged offenses, due process
Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust v. Viteri - foreclosure, standing
Landmark Amer Ins v. Pin-Pon - pretrial stipulation; withdrawal
Pierre v. State - excessive public defender lien
JC v. DCF - termination, parental rights
State v. Ester - withheld adjudication
DHSMV v. Davis - driver's license, implied consent, blood draw

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

SH v. DCF - termination, parental rights
SH v. DCF - termination, parental rights
Ali v. Wells Fargo - attorney's fees
Clerk of Court v. Seminole County - mandamus; county surplus funds, investment
Adams v. DOC - second-tier certiorari, disciplinary action
Lively v. State - postconviction relief
Robles v. State- postconviction DNA testing
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.