Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 4 - 8, 2019
February 09, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Al-Rayes v. Willingham - RICO
Ray v. Ala DOC - stay of execution, RLUIPA
Paez v. Mulvey - qualified immunity

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

McGee v. McGee - lack of transcript; child support
Von Young v. State - burglary, robbery
Banks v. State - probation revocation
Forehand v. State - certiorari, circuit court appeal, dismissal
Lantz v. State - character evidence, homicide instruction, premeditation
Lagi v. State - appellate jurisdiction, psych evaluation denial
Rawson v. Rawson - alimony, child support, fees
Cassesus v. State - plea withdrawal
Lizzmore v. Lizzmore - alimony
Hutsell v. Hutsell - domestic violence injunction
Hill v. State - prohibition
Kanter Real Estate v. DEP - administrative review, oil well permit
Walker v. State - sexually violent predator, evaluation
Sarazin v. Sarazin - equitable distribution, alimony, fees
Barbesco v. State - postconviction relief
Fla Gas v. Johnson - eminent domain, fees
Giles v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Pitts v. State - Williams rule, character evidence
Leonard v. State - postconviction relief
McCullum v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Matthews v. Matthews - equitable distribution
Verizon Wireless v. Bateman - arbitration
Pierce v. Pierce - trial court jurisdiction pending appeal
In re Butler - parental timesharing
ET v. DCF - dependency

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

State v. Wong - certiorari, 12-person jury
Zurich v. Puccini - insurance, implied co-insureds, commercial lease
Gonzalez-Barrera v. Majorca Towers - injunction, condominium, pleading
Mendez v. Mendez Lopez - chapter 751, substitute parent
Alvarez-Reyes v. Fernandez-Gil - imputed income, alimony
MDXQ v. Miami-Dade - mandamus, county comprehensive plan
Golde v. Placentra - summary affirmance
Osechas v. Arcila - certiorari, punitive damages
Dade Truss v. Beaty - certiorari, work product, privilege log
EU v. DCF - summary affirmance

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Grosso v. HSBC Bank - foreclosure, attorney's fees
Yost-Rudge v. A to Z Props - homestead, marital property
Feliciano v. State - postconviction relief
Rincon v. State - false verification
Roussell v. Bank of NY - foreclosure, standing
Sirmons v. State - time served
Pagliaro v. Pagliaro - ratification
Venezia v. JP Morgan - foreclosure, attorney's fees
RJ Reynolds v. Alonso - disqualification, ex parte communications

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

RJ Reynolds v. Sheffield - certified conflict, Engle, punitive damages
Gould v. State - withdraw plea, ore tenus
Howitt v. State - DUI tests, refusal, suppression
Benabe-Rivera v. State - Spencer bar, pro se filings
Chaudhry v. Pedersen - dismissal, breach of contract, necessary party
Sanders v. State - probation, revocation
Espinoza v. State - sentencing
Barker v. State - Spencer bar, pro se filings
Denegal v. State - sentencing
JM v. State - concession of error
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.