Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of November 11 - 15, 2019
November 16, 2019

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Brown v. US - Hobbs Act, sentencing
Pinson v. JPMorgan Chase - FDCPA, FCRA
Cambridge Christian Sch v. Fla High Sch Athl Assoc - Establishment Clause
Debernardis v. IQ Formulations - FDCA, standing

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re Judge Lemonidis - judicial discipline
In re Fla R Civ P - amended rules, new amount in controversy requirement
In re Fla Pro R - amended rules
In re Fla R Traffic Ct - amended rules

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

House v. State - search and seizure
Glover v. State - belated appeal
Olvera v. Hernandez Constr - workers' compensation
King v. State - manslaughter, flounder gig
Classy Cycles v. Panama City Bch - scooter ordinances, preemption
Premier Comm Healthcare v. Rivera - workers' compensation
Rice v. State - accessory after fact
Schroll v. Schroll - alimony

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Lee v. Chmielewski - insurance, settlement, acceptance
Stacknik v. US Bank - foreclosure, paragraph 22
Villa Bellini v. Mancini - corporate records, shareholders, inspection
Deeson Media v. Tampa - mandamus, city official, residency, mootness
HR v. State - probation, costs
Allenbrand v. State - search and seizure
DACS v. Dellaselva - eminent domain
Berouty v. State - closing argument
Usry v. State - reasonable doubt instruction
Cox v. State - juvenile sentencing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Aquino v. State - probation revocation
Pujol v. State - witness opinion on guilt, criminal mischief damages
Perez v. Safepoint Ins - fraud on the court
Ruiz v. State - postconviction relief
Sanchez v. Sanchez - rule 1.540, voidness, post-judgment orders
Beiro v. State - postconviction relief
Garcia v. Publix - slip and fall
Farr v. State - appellate jurisdiction, confidential informant
ML v. DCF - certiorari, reunification case plan
Sams v. State - pro se sanctions
Jackson v. State - habeas corpus

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Nationwide v. Muro - proposal for settlement; preservation of error
Suarez v. Suarez - alimony; child support
Harmon v. State - sentencing
Spires v. State - sentencing
German v. State - sentencing, jurisdiction
Pillay v. Public Storage - exculpatory clause; commercial landlord, negligence
Vergne v. Glidewell - attorney's fees; property partition

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Fonger v. Nall - auto collision, directed verdict
Dosal v. State - concession of error, double jeopardy
Bauduy v. Adventist Health - Amendment 7, section 395.0197(4), consistency
Bayview Loan v. Cross - attorney's fees, contract, fees for fees
Martinez v. Lebron - paternity, UCCJEA
Reed v. State - murder, burglary
Reynosopena v. State - sentence, youthful offender
Smith v. State - postconviction relief
Niemi v. State - sex offender probation, violation
Washer v. State - postconviction relief
Poole v. State - probation violation, written order
DOR v. Rogers - contempt, child support
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.