Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of December 14 - 18, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   December 18, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

SEC v. MinTrade - personal jurisdiction, administrative subpoena
SEC v. Marin - personal jurisdiction, administrative subpoena

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Balogh v. ABC Liquors - intoxication evidence, causation
Mutch v. State - manslaughter evidence
Dixon v. State - belated appeal, mootness
Orso v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, no motion pending
Eleazer v. State - ineffective assistance, premature argument
Spratling v. FCOR - certiorari, commission's discretion
Mitchell v. Young - employment, racial discrimination, relatiation
Vincent v. Vincent - psychotherapist-patient privilege
Ringenberg v. Ringenberg - contempt; time-sharing, modification
DOC v. Monroe - habeas corpus procedure
Branch v. State - postconviction relief
Wallace v. State - pro se sanctions
Dukes v. State - postconviction relief
Craig-Myers v. OTIS - certiorari, public hazard discovery
Palm Bch Fire v. Wilkes - workers' compensation
Pulliam v. State - prohibition, speedy trial, Covid-19
DACS v. Henry & Rilla White Found - vacating automatic stay

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Brown v. State - scrivener's errors
Bailey v. State - postconviction relief
Drossos v. State - Stand Your Ground
Rennert v. Rennert - equitable distribution
Lockwood v. Lockwood - child support
Black v. Black - domestic violence injunction
Justice v. State - sentencing, withholding adjudication

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Hardin v. RJ Reynolds - product liability, Engle progeny, evidence
Digiport v. Foram Dev - trade secrets
Koyfman v. 1572 Pledger - foreclosure, assignment, subrogation
Miami Bch v. Miami New Times - mandamus, public records, draft audit reports
Cabrera v. Wal-Mart - slip and fall, past noneconomic damages, additur
Extreme Emer Fire v. Lloyd's - insurance, anti-assignment clause
1440 Plaza v. New Gala Bldg - prohibition, judicial disqualification
H Greg Auto v. Raskin - appellate fees, untimely motion
Julien v. Alhadeff - summary judgment standard
Gross v. Am Fed Title - certiorari, discovery, privilege, waiver
FC v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Walker v. State - certiorari, sentencing

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Holland v. State - Nelson hearing
Sanders v. State - due process, bench conference
Hart v. State - Stand Your Ground, certified conflict
Barrios v. State - spoliation
Joramo Partners v. 4326 Ocean Dr - oral ruling, written judgment
Ho v. Fountains of Palm Beach - final order
Aponte v. Wood - willful noncompliance, written findings
Joyce v. Shingary - attorney's fees, jurisdictional threshold
State v. Charlton - withhold adjudication
Skylink Jets v. Klukan - prevailing party
Laterza v. Winderman - leave to amend
Sabetti v. Smith - injunction, findings

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Baldwin v. Harris - prenuptial agreement, breach
Napolitano v. St Joseph - First Amendment, church autonomy
Archer v. State - probation, animal ownership ban
Sanchez v. State - appellate jurisdiction, plea withdrawal
Fortini v. de Palma - receivership
In re Paulucci - satisfaction and release, rescission
Kalantary v. US Servs - employment at will
Wilcox v. Cupstid - statutory easement, fees
Akins v. State - pro se sanctions
Joseph v. State - sentencing


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.