Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 3 - 7, 2020

Appellate & Trial Support   |   February 7, 2020
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Johnston v. Fla DOC - habeas corpus
Ala St Conf of NAACP v. Alabama - VRA, immunity
Martin v. US - habeas corpus
Darrisaw v. Pa Higher Ed Assistance Agency - FDCPA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Griffin v. LaSalle Bank - continuing jurisdiction, foreclosure
In re Fla R Jud Admin - amended rule
In re Std Jury Instr (Crim) - amended instructions

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Metz v. MAT Media - legislative subpoenas, investigation
Jarvis v. State - sentencing
Marshall v. State - ineffective assistance
Wingate v. State - search and seizure
Gettis v. State - probation violation
Williams v. Jones - marital dissolution, alimony, fees
Stewart v. Stewart - marital dissolution, fees
Johnson v. State - capital offense, jury

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Marenco v. Marenco - marital dissolution, child support
Berouty v. State - closing arguments, fundamental error, preservation
2-Bal Bay v. Asset Mgmt - unjust enrichment, fraudulent transfer
Sinopoli v. Clark - stalking injunction
BMG Realty v. US Bank - foreclosure, limitations
Skeen v. Comnes - contempt, appellate standing
Progressive v. Herzoff - certiorari, discovery, claim file
Larocca v. State - ineffective appellate assistance
Team Richo v. Rapid Sec Sol - certiorari, executable nonfinal order
Powers v. State - double jeopardy
Jackson v. State - probation revocation
Bauman v. State - search and seizure
Eylward v. State - criminal restitution
Sturgill v. Lucas - negligence, duty of care
William v. State - theft, criminal intent
Baptiste v. State - postconviction relief
SK Condo v. NS/CSE Siesta Key - condo litigation, fee shifting

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Martinez v. State - double jeopardy
Miami Gardens v. US Bank - certified copies, § 162.09
Baptiste v. People's Trust - insurance, appraisal
Kitchen v. State - habeas corpus
Watkins v. State - sentencing
Miami-Dade v. East Part - certiorari, class action, discovery
SS v. DCF - judicial disqualification
Brother's Paint v. Curry-Dixon - common law indemnity
Rojas v. Gallamini - personal jurisdiction
Ezra v. Ezra - parenting plan
AW v. DCF - dependency

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Moore v. State - involuntary confession
Denton v. HSBC Bank - foreclosure, conditions precedent
Almodovar v. State - speedy trial
Mathieu v. State - postconviction relief
Cohen v. HEC Cleaning - en banc; e-mail service; § 57.105, safe harbor
Arzoumanian v. US Bank - pro se appeals, sanction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Delafield v. State - criminal, investigative costs
State v. Salgado - appellate jurisdiction
Perrelli v. Failla - fraud, breach; property, knowledge of defects
State Farm v. Crispin - appraiser, contingency fee, ADR
Dur-Rich v. Calzaretta - attorney's fees, waiver
Pacheco v. State - postconviction relief
Stallworth v. State - plea withdrawal; jurisdiction, trial court
Mesidor v. State - postconviction relief
Young v. State - criminal, restitution, evidence
Smith v. State - aggravated battery, scrivener's error
Taylor v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Cherizard v. State - sentence


©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.