Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 9 - 13, 2020
March 14, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

In re Krieg - bankruptcy
Keohane v. Fla DOC - § 1983, Eighth Amendment

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Pedroza v. State - juvenile sentencing
Sanchez-Torres v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Petrano v. Baylor - lack of transcript
MacNeil v. Crestview Hosp - class action, medical services, PIP
Bryan v. ACHA - Medicaid lien
Johnson v. State - murder, photo evidence, instructions, closing
Dominguez v. SE Personnel - workers' compensation
Casper v. State - sentencing
Morris v. State - sentencing
Hyland v. DOC - habeas corpus
State v. Oppenheimer - en banc denial
State v. Petagine - en banc denial, criminal hazing
State v. Kluttz - en banc denial

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Acevedo v. State - misstated burden of proof
Grimshaw v. State - sentencing
Deutsche Bank v. Bennett - sanction, dismissal, certified conflict
Jones v. State - child neglect
Waldron v. Trican - unliquidated damages
Morroni v. Wilmington Sav - foreclosure, standing
DiLeonardo v. State - probation revocation
Svetlanovich v. State Farm - insurance, misrepresentations
4927 Voorhees Rd v. Tesoriero - arbitration
Stanlick v. Stanlick - domestic violence injunction
Avatar P&C v. Jones - certiorari, work product
Douglas v. State - postconviction relief
Sanchez v. State - sentencing
Davis v. State - juvenile sentencing
AJS v. EE - appellate jurisdiction
Ciccarello v. Siena Villas - appellate jurisdiction
Bunnell v. State - competency
Velenty v. Saraiva - manifest weight
Kernan v. Deutsche Bank - foreclosure
Robinson v. Polk Cnty Sch Bd - closing argument
Sewell v. Blackman - habeas corpus

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Rivera v. State - sentencing
CS v. State - delinquency
State v. Yero - appellate jurisdiction
Super Cars v. Webster - settlement agreement
Marriott v. Fisher & Davidson - certiorari, lis pendens
O'Steen v. State - child support

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Rivera v. State - Stand Your Ground hearing
Dawson v. Hernandez - redemption, foreclosure
Waveblast Watersports v. UH-Pomano - lease, end date
Cox v. US Bank - foreclosure, standing
Kokhan v. Auto Club Ins - insurance, exclusion
State v. Dixon - postconviction relief
BB Inlet Prop v. 920 N Stanley - riparian rights, sanctions
World-Class Talent v. Giordano - corporate dissolution
Williams v. Boyd-Panciera Family Funeral - emotional distress, physical impact
Sager v. Sager - dissolution, distribution
Citizens For Thoughtful Growth v. West Palm Beach - discovery, member names, standing

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Bank of America v. Green Emerald - dismissal, mortgage superiority
Romaine v. Romaine - clarification, settlement agreement, counteroffer
Biss v. Biss - contempt sanction, lack of transcript
Cook v. Bank of NY - foreclosure, attorney's fees
Beato v. State - passport surrender, return
Hartman v. State- Spencer bar, pro se
Campbell v. State - plea, competency
Easley v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Bellomy v. State - Spencer Millan v. State warning, pro se
Millan v. State - sentence, vindictiveness
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.