Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of September 7 - 11, 2020
September 11, 2020

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Domante v. Dish - FCRA, breach of settlement
Feshbach v. IRS - bankruptcy, tax debt, discharge
Doe v. Miami-Dade - Rule 15(b), amend pleadings
Geter v. Akunwanne - 1983, prison conditions, exhaustion
Jones v. Fla - felon reenfranchisement

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Thompson v. DeSantis - mandamus; FSC appointment, eligibility
Heritage Manor v. DFG Grp - jurisdiction discharged
In re Fla R Juv P - amended rules
In re Fla R Jud Admin - amended rule

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Lumpkin v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Roberts v. State - postconviction relief
Dunlap v. State - sentencing
Bartley v. State - sentencing
Waites v. Middleton - Applegate affirmance, no transcript
Gregory v. State - sentencing, cruel and unusual punishment
Barnes v. State - expert, reliance on other experts
Morgan v. State - postconviction relief
Hadley v. RAAC - reemployment assistance, HIPAA violation
State Farm v. Bellamy - certiorari, modification pending review, mootness
Bellamy v. State Farm - certiorari, bad faith claims, wrongful denial
Brown v. State - sentencing

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Shaw v. State - wearing stun belt at trial
Riverside Hts v. Tampa - real property, § 163.380, community redevelopment
Owners Ins v. Armour - certiorari, discovery, insurers, privilege, waiver limits
Sterns v. Charles Schwab - certiorari, in camera inspection
Myrick v. Inch - habeas corpus, postconviction relief, venue

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Howard v. Greenwich Ins - motion to dismiss, standards
People's Trust Ins v. Alonzo-Pombo - insurance, damages, no proof of loss
Am Med Academy v. Bd of Nursing - administrative review
WC WH v. Colony Am Fin - foreclosure, original note, summary judgment
Murphy v. Collins - judicial disqualification, UCCJEA

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Moultrop v. GEICO - mediation communications
Riva v. Chavez - proposal for settlement, party representative
Habal v. Habal - contingent remainderman, revocable trust
Walker v. Harley-Anderson - injunction, stalking
Cripe v. State - sentencing
Abdo v. Avatar Prop & Caus Ins - insurance, willful noncompliance
Goldberg v. Universal Prop & Caus Ins - insurance, supplemental claim
Peavey v. State - sentencing
Gravitystorm LLC v. Old Dominion Ins - insurance, appraisal

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Lemko v. Golf Properties - set aside judgment; due process, notice
Stowell v. State - Anders appeal, competency
Caro v. State - murder; experiment, admissibility; non-expert opinion
Torres v. State - postconviction relief
Pritchard v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Hardy v. State - Anders appeal, written order
Adorno v. State - sentence
Nieves v. Guthrie - prohibition, disqualification
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.