Menu

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 26 - 30, 2021

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of July 26 - 30, 2021

Appellate & Trial Support   |   July 30, 2021
Download Download   
Share Share Page

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

McIntosh v. Royal Caribbean - diversity, maritime jurisdiction
Coral Ridge v. Amazon - defamation, religious discrimination
Smith v. US - jurisdiction, FTCA, medical malpractice

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Jones v. State - workers' compensation
Sharp v. State - mandamus, incorrect relief
Bayfront HMA v. DOR - administrative review, tax assessment, refund
Adams v. State - sentencing
Santa Rosa v. Home Builders - injunction, impact fee, constitutional challenge
FIGA v. Fichte - insurance settlement, deductible
Brock v. State - pro se sanctions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Anderson v. State - prior DWLSR convictions, certified conflict
Mickens v. Tampa Police- written opinion granted, forfeiture, certified conflict
Claudio-Martinez v. State - justifiable nondeadly force instruction, ineffective assistance
Mojito Splash v. Holmes Bch - Bert Harris Act, vacation rentals
Miller v. State - postconviction relief
Pirtle v. State - sentencing
Williams v. State - postconviction relief
Hester v. Savannah HOA - certiorari, counterclaim, lis pendens

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami


Avatar v. Caires - directed verdict, damages
SEG v. Diversified Aero Inventory - settlement, default
Vista v. BONYM - foreclosure, affiliation
Mendoza v. Curbello - parenting, child support
CRSJ v. Miami-Dade - injunction, annexation, jurisdiction
United v. Central Therapy - summary judgment, affidavit
United v. NB Sports - hearsay exception, foundation
Tavarez v. Nu-Way - motion to dismiss, settlement agrmt
Leder v. Imburgia - motion to dismiss, arbitration waiver
Cazarez v. State - certiorari, postconviction relief
G4S v. Publix - certiorari, discovery
La-Casse v. Inch - postconviction relief
Hitchman v. State - prohibition, fingerprinting

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Reyes v. State - postconviction relief
Live Young v. Allstate - venue

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Jones v. State - postconviction relief
Edwards v. Codrington - paternity, jurisdiction
Oral v. Oral - agreement, parental right, duress
Rangel v. Rangel - deed invalidation, summary judgment, premarital agreement
Johnson v. State - resisting officer, without violence; costs
Conley v. State - sexual predator designation
Ayala v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Windsor v. Longest - certiorari, timeliness; access to courts, pro se


©2022 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.