Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of June 14 - 18, 2021
June 21, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Chua v. Ekonomou - receivers, judicial immunity
US v Anderson - jury instructions, right not to testify
Thamator v. US Atty Gen - asylum, removal
US v. Nunez - jurisdiction over vessel

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re R Reg Fla Bar - IOTA program
In re Marijuana - citizens' initiative review
Haliburton v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fam L Forms - amended forms

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Grace v. State - juvenile sentencing
Copeland v. State - jail credit
Davis v. State - prohibition, Covid-19
Drake v. State - habeas corpus
Winters v. Harper - insurance reference, trial
RC v. DACS - firearms license
St Lucie Schools v. Alexander - workers' compensation
Muchhala v. DHSMV - driver's license, suspension
Perera v. Kennedy - appellate jurisdiction

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Waite v. Chapman - stalking injunction, mootness
Idelson v. Carmer - timesharing, modification
Burney v. State - postconviction relief
Wells Fargo v. Dias - foreclosure
Sarasota v. Venice Reg Med Ctr - prohibition, sovereign immunity, indigent medical care
Scherer v. Andriotis - contingency fee, charging lien, standing, apportionment
Signal Outdoor v. Metro Sys - injunction, scope
Lefcourt v. Kilpatrick - mootness

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Haddad v. Medina - child support
DiGiacomo v. Mosquera - amend pleading, alimony
Jain v. Buchanan - summary judgment, amend complaint
Lago v. Amerant - summary judgment, subject matter jurisdiction
Rousseau v. Miami-Dade - exhaustion, collective bargaining agmnt
United Auto v. CCSF - PIP coverage, equitable estoppel
Drexel Ave v. Dalton - eviction, injunction, sanctions, jurisdiction
RLG v. State - indirect criminal contempt, hearsay, GPS information
RH v. DCF - prohibition, termination of parental rights
Lawrence v. Gibraltor - appellate jurisdiction, attorney's fees, sanctions

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Laurel Point Care v. Desantis - arbitration, separate document
Securitas Security Servs v. Williams - certiorari, financial discovery
Calderone v. Curtis Stokes & Assocs - attorney's fees

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Bowers v. Tillman - auto injury, new trial
Cemoni v. Ratner - fees, bad faith conduct, attorney
Wilson v. Houston - amendment, setoff defense
MTW Jordan v. Baskerville - voluntary dismissal, jurisdiction
Lykkebak v. Lykkebak - dissolution, contempt
State v. Koontz - suppression, warrantless vehicle search
Brack v. Brack - dissolution, scrivener's error
Perry v. State - aggravated assault, cost
Bowhey v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Johnson v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Rivera v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate
Rivera-Torres v. Fernandez - prohibition, disqualification
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.