Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of March 15 - 19, 2021
March 20, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Clay v. Comm'r of Int Rev - taxable income
US v. Mayweather - entrapment, Hobbs Act
PDVSA v. Lukoil Pan - standing
St Elien v. All Cnty Envir Servs - FLSA
Sleeth v. Comm'r of Int Rev - taxes, innocent spouse

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

No decisions this week.

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Odom v. Odom - alimony
Thomas v. State - postconviction relief, jurisdiction pending appeal
Austin v. State - appellate review, rule 3.800(c) ruling
Kirkland v. State - juvenile sentencing
Cobb v. State - probation revocation, sentencing
Gilliam v. State - speedy trial
Ali v. Am Airlines - workers' compensation, costs
Wilkins v. Wilkins - imputed income
Heckerman v. Heckerman - lack of transcript
Scott v. Cent Fla Siding - workers' compensation
Daniels v. State - attempted murder, battery, involuntary intoxication
Castle Key Ins v. Fischer - appraisal, partial coverage
Freeman v. DOH - license revocation, stay pending appeal
Briggs v. Housend - appellate jurisdiction, leave to amend
McArthur v. State - juvenile sentencing
Potter v. Potter - marital dissolution, marriage length
Stokes v. Jones - prohibition, order during stay
Ford v. State - postconviction relief

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Waichman v. Chaikin - personal jurisdiction, agency
Abdo v. Abdo - civil contempt, imprecise void order
Arizone v. Homeowners Choice - rule 1.442, premature settlement proposal
Edwards v. State - collateral crime evidence
JW v. State - resisting arrest, battery, law enforcement
Lively v. Grandhige - new trial, manifest weight, standard
DCF v. Panno - service of process, public agency

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Barbato v. State Farm - motion to compel appraisal
Kratos v. ICD - motion to compel arbitration
Mother v. DCF - termination of parental rights
Parks v. State - postconviction relief
Lucas v. State - postconviction relief
Dial 4 Care v. Brinson - certiorari, medical malpractice
Lloyd's London v. Jimenez - motion to compel appraisal
Griffin v. Sweetwater Police - motion to dismiss, forfeiture
Scott v. State - postconviction relief
Yague v. Viera - certiorari, nonparty subpoena

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Rauch Weaver v. Legault - s. 542.335, restrictive covenants, pleading
Fernandez v. Fernandez - marital dissolution
Zurz v. State - competency, hearing
Bezl v. Raymond Office - lease, default for possession
MK v. DCF - termination, parental rights
Rebalko v. Atallah - service of process, waiver
People's Trust v. Pellicer - appraisal, insurance claim, hearing
Foundation Flooring v. Reichard - rehearing, appellate jurisdiction
JM v. DCF - dependency

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Berg v. State - corrected opinion; Anders appeal, costs
Zalloum v. Select Portfolio - appellate dismissal, mootness
Juravin v. DCS Real Estate - certiorari, indirect criminal contempt
Harrison v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
Tapp v. State - burglary, competency, sentencing
Louverture v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.