Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of May 24 - 28, 2021
May 29, 2021

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Estepa - wire fraud, intent
Todd v. Fayette Cty School Dist - ADA
Malkin v. Wells Fargo - certified question to Delaware Supreme Court, insurance policies
US v. Cook - compassionate release, judicial review
US v. Roberson - official acts, bribery
Kennedy v. Floridian Hotel - ADA
US v. Cody - certificate of appealability
Absolute Activists Fund v. Devine - collateral, continuing jurisdiction, dissent

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

DOH v. Florigrown - medical marijuana, licenses, injunction
Fla Bar v. Aven - attorney discipline
Bogle v. State - capital case, postconviction relief

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Synot Constr v. Page - prohibition
Simpkins v. State - habeas corpus
Lombardi v. State - habeas corpus, pro se sanctions
Thurman v. Davis - lack of transcript; fees, § 66.021
Premier Behavioral v. Magellan - health care payment dispute resolution, § 408.7057
Holton v. State - sentencing, probation revocation
Rhodes v. 2140 Commonwealth - mandamus, mootness
Williams v. Inch - pro se sanctions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Zurich v. Samson - workers' compensation
Brody Trust v. Brody - accord and satisfaction
Ouimette v. Ouimette - equitable distribution
Peterson v. Ibrahim - employment, course and scope
Decker v. Munson - stalking injunction
Howard v. State - postconviction relief
Jackman v. Cebrink-Swartz - intrusion upon seclusion, camera, certified question
DCF v. Musa - certiorari, involuntary commitment
Wilmington Sav v. Morroni - foreclosure, original documents, return
USF v. Rowsey - settlement agreement, interpretation
Howard v. State - sentencing, deviation from mandate, finality
Mack v. Univ P&C - Condominium Act, attorney's fees
Mortellaro v. Caribe Health - settlement agreement, interpretation

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Drexel Avenue v. Dalton - eviction

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Sanders v. Sanders - marital dissolution
State v. Tavenese - investigative subpoena, DUI
Empire Pro Resto v. Citizens - insurance, "all-risk" policy
Waters v. Wilmington Trust - foreclosure, attorney's fees
Jones v. State - hearsay, excited utterance; other crimes, murder
Baptiste v. Bank of Am - ecclesiastical abstention
Land & Sea Petroleum v. Leavitt - nominal damages, waiver
Five Solas v. Ram Realty - insurance, replacement cost, lost rent
Bartolone v. State - narcotics, joint constructive possession
Raines v. State - sentencing
State Farm v. Stand up MRI - PIP, reimbursement calculation
Brown v. Omega - insurance, assignment of benefits, standing
State Farm v. Pan Am Diag - PIP, reimbursement limitation
Progressive v. Broward Ins - insurance, appraisal, prohibitive cost
Colebrook v. State - battery, closing argument, costs

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Gonzalez v. State - sentence
Smith v. Smith - dissolution, alimony
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.