Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 25 - 29, 2022
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
US v. Thomas - sentencing
US v. Clark - Brady, suppression, trial rulings
Johnson v. Fla - exhaustion, abstention
Djadju v. Vega - mootness, habeas, immigration
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
Pittman v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
Dial v. Calusa Palms - Medicare benefits, evidence, past expenses
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
DSK Grp v. Zurich - workers’ compensation
Toyens v. State - statutory rape
Jackson v. State - habeas corpus, unauthorized
Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
Petro Welt v. Brinkmann - certiorari, corporate depositions, apex
Zetrouer v. State - drug possession
Edmonds v. State - sentencing
AS v. State - adjudicatory hearing, Zoom, necessity
Addit v. Estate of Ingolia - arbitration, unconscionability, severability
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Plastiquim v. Odebrecht Constr - fraud, conspiracy, RICO
United Auto Ins v. Health Care Family Rehab - attorney’s fees, findings
Chess v. Sweeney - fraud on the court, monetary sanctions
Milian v. State - postconviction relief
Ross-Williams v. Leali - receivership, scope, proceedings supplementary
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
Lopez v. MGA Ins - pre- and post-judgment interest, waiver
Sikich v. State - sentencing
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
Harrell v. State - postconviction relief
Crenshaw v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener’s error
Giddens v. State - Anders appeal, cost
Guardian Ad Litem Program v. Campbell - certiorari; custody transfer
LM v. DCF - dependency, sufficient evidence
©2023 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.