Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of April 4 - 8, 2022
April 09, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

US v. Sanchez - sentencing, motion to suppress
McNamara v. GEICO - insurance, bad faith
CFPB v. Ocwen - consent judgment
Pingora v. Scarver - defective deeds, Ga law
Ingram v. Kubik - qualified immunity, ADA

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

Valentine v. State - capital case, postconviction relief
In re Fla Fam L R Pro - rule amendment

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Huggins v. Siegel - second rehearing motion, disrespectful motion
Davis v. State - sentencing
Physicians Med Cntrs v. Allstate - PIP, unreasonable expenses
Reese v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness
Oyebanji v. Collier - child support, imputed income
Casey v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness
Fudge v. State - ineffective assistance, appellate counsel
Wright v. DOH - pharmacy license, emergency suspension
Hall v. State - mandamus, duty to rule, mootness
Nixon v. State - sexual battery, instructions

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

AR v. DCF - dependency, best interests, due process
Centrella v. Bank of NY - foreclosure, bankruptcy
Thomas v. Thomas - temporary injunction, bond
Larson v. FC Oyster Harbor - certiorari, discovery, in camera inspection
Creller v. State - search and seizure
Greeley v. Walmart - affidavit, sham, inconsistent testimony
MM v. State - Zoom hearing, delinquency proceeding
White v. State - Faretta hearing

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Swift v. State - Faretta hearing
State Farm v. All X-Ray - insurance, PIP, Daubert
Tucker v. Ebadian - derivative claim, special litigation committee
United Auto v. Millennium Radiology - collateral estoppel
Perez v. Reitman - intervention
Smith v. State - sentencing
Polo v. Hernandez - magistrate report, exceptions, hearing

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Ocwen Loan Serv v. Bishop - escrow waiver, leave to amend
MS v. State - unwarranted pat-down
Shaw v. Shaw - temporary child support, alimony
PTIC v. Slavin - insurance, appraisal, appellate jurisdiction

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

Hunt v. State - Anders appeal, oral sentence
Alchin v. Barton - summary judgment, res judicata
Ghazzawieh v. Iglesias - attorney's fees, proposal for settlement
BMW v. Henry - contingency multiplier, Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Lanford v. Phemister - homestead sale proceeds
Orlando Bar Grp v. DeSantis - COVID-19 orders, inverse condemnation
Butler v. Brown - injunction, dock lighting
Publix v. Molina - certiorari, discovery
Siegler v. Empire Dawn - summary judgment, new standard
Figueroa v. Kossiver - modification, parental responsibilities, time-sharing
Black v. State - postconviction relief
Fusco v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
Pierre v. State - Anders appeal, scrivener's error
Justice Admin Comm'n v. Wilson - certiorari, attorney's fees
Barnes v. State - Spencer bar, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.