Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of February 28 - March 4, 2022
March 05, 2022

U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Newbauer v. Carnival Corp - pleading, notice of risk, maritime law
Reiterman v. Abid - arbitration
Glynn Envtl Coalition v. Sea Island Acquisition - standing, injury in fact
Jenkins v. Nell - race discrimination, convincing mosaic test
Warrior Met Coal Mining v. United Mine Workers - arbitration

Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee

In re R Reg Fla Bar - amended bar rules
In re Apportionment - legislative redistricting

First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee

Brown v. Gulf Breeze - tax exemption
Alcon v. Collins - domestic violence injunction, standing
Spradley v. Citizens - insurance, duty to defend
Sanders v. Chaplin - guardianship, fees, certified conflict
Yacht & Racquet Club v. OIR - administrative appeal, standing
Huddleston v. Chaney St Place - eviction challenge
Crum v. FWCC - rule challenge
Mr Comfort v. DOR - administrative challenge, evidentiary hearing
Gosch v. State - pro se sanctions
CH v. DCF - failure to prosecute appeal

Second District Court of Appeal - Lakeland

Williams v. Fernandez - settlement proposal, excusable neglect
TA v. AS - paternity
Reyes v. Gonzalez - opinion withdrawn, settlement
Progressive Select v. Kagan Jugan - settlement proposal, good faith

Third District Court of Appeal - Miami

Hernandez v. CGI Windows - evidence, unsworn pleadings
ARP Acquisitions v. PHH Mort - foreclosure, reconsideration, jurisdiction
Impex Caribe v. Carl Levin PA - fees, multiplier
State v. Moore - Stand Your Ground
Scheckler v. Monroe Cnty - second-tier certiorari, voluntary payment, mootness
Shavarshyan v. Heavenly Spirits - standard of review, bench trial
Damas v. Rappleye - pro se continuance motion, marital dissolution trial
Miami Beach v. Clevelander - temporary injunction, noise limits, estoppel
Spivy v. State - sentencing
Nemani v. Sachmechi - fees, lack of transcript, Applegate affirmance
IT v. DCF - parental rights, termination
Pace v. State - sentencing
RR v. DCF - certiorari, dependency, hearsay, negative-implication canon

Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach

Philip Morris v. Naugle - attorney's fees, Daubert, expert
Millien v. State - sentencing
Tita v. Tita - probate, LLC devise
Seith v. Seith - child support, timesharing
Blair v. State - sentencing
Whyte v. Whyte - durational alimony
Guibord v. Chopin - incapacity, guardian, mootness
Daniello v. Settle - child custody, changed circumstances

Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach

State v. Boyd - sexual predator designation
Hipley v. State - postconviction relief
Voyles v. Glavin - probate, jurisdiction; fees, inequitable conduct doctrine
RS v. CPT - involuntary substance abuse treatment
Zimmershead v. State - postconviction relief
Hill v. DOR - lack of transcript
Universal Prop Ins v. Motie - insurance policy, material breach, directed verdict
Grillo v. State - postconviction relief
Knight v. Nordmann - lack of transcript
Lewis v. State - Spencer warning, pro se
Related Practices
Appellate & Trial Support
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.