Florida Appeals Court Decisions: Week of January 23 - 27, 2023
U.S. Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals
FTC v Simple Health - FTC powers
SkyHop Tech v Praveen Narra - personal jurisdiction
US v King - sentencing, dissent
Florida Supreme Court - Tallahassee
In re Fla R GP & JA - amended rule
First District Court of Appeal - Tallahassee
LB v. DCF - dismissal, failure to prosecute
Susick v. State - habeas corpus
Diaz v. NWFWMD - administrative review, § 120.595, fees
Clark v. Baney - pro se sanctions
Harvey v. State - pro se sanctions
Second District Court of Appeal - St. Petersburg
Cordero v. FIGA - insurance, sinkhole coverage, notice
Corona v. State - robbery, sudden snatching, instructions
ND v. State - burglary, delinquency
Dunley v. Dunley - trust, accounting
Third District Court of Appeal - Miami
Gomez v. Philip Morris - wrongful death, appellate jurisdiction, finality
Carballo v. State - postconviction relief
Hernandez v. Vidal - Applegate affirmance, partial concession
Bernabeu v. State - postconviction relief
DHSMV v. Fortes - sovereign immunity
Publix v. Blanco - certiorari, corporate-wide discovery
Holmes v. State - postconviction relief
Fourth District Court of Appeal - West Palm Beach
USAA v. Robinson - subrogation, dismissal, four corners
Randolph v. State - probation, new crimes
Fries v. Anderson - attorney’s fees, pleading
Gay v. Jupiter Island Compound - absolute immunity
Cleveland Clinic v. Oriolo - punitive damages, gross negligence, ratification
Holness v. Cherfilus - anti-SLAPP, conflict certification
Fifth District Court of Appeal - Daytona Beach
US Bank v. Bell - foreclosure, standing
Sixth District Court of Appeal - Lakeland
No decisions this week
©2023 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.