Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

11th Circuit Requires Repair for RCV Benefits
October 06, 2010

In September 2010, the Eleventh Circuit issued its decision in Buckley Towers Condominium, Inc. v. QBE Insurance Corp., 2010 WL 3551609 (11th Cir. Sept. 14, 2010). The decision upholds policy provisions requiring insureds to first make repairs to property before claiming replacement cost coverage or law and ordinance coverage.

The insured, a pair of condominium towers, were covered by a property insurance policy that said that the insurer "will not pay on a replacement cost basis for any loss or damage (1) Until the lost or damaged property is actually repaired or replaced; and (2) Unless the repairs or replacement are made as soon as reasonably possible after the loss or damage." The insurance contract did not provide for advance payments for repairs. The insured submitted a proof of loss, claiming Actual Cost Value (ACV) and Replacement Cost Value (RCV) damages. The insurer construed it as a premature claim for RCV damages and did not respond.

The insured sued, conceding that the policy required it to make repairs before claiming RCV damages, which it had not done. The trial court nonetheless ruled that the insurer had "prevented" the insured from performing its obligations under the policy. The jury found for the insured.

The Eleventh Circuit reversed in part, concluding that Florida’s "prevention of performance" doctrine did not apply in this case. The court reaffirmed that the doctrine cannot be used to rewrite an unambiguous insurance contract, and does not apply where an insurer is simply following the plain terms of the contract and is not imposing obstacles outside of the contract.

Buckley Towers strongly affirms a property insurer’s right to insist that the insured follow the plain terms of an insurance contract for which the insured freely negotiated. Under Florida law as applied by the Eleventh Circuit, insureds who agree to make repairs before seeking RCV payments will not be excused from that obligation simply because the repairs may be inconvenient or expensive.
Related Practices
Life, Annuity, and Retirement Litigation
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.