Menu

Court Confirms Scope Of Statutory Immunity Against Suits Related To Appointment Of Medical Staff Members

Appellate & Trial Support   |   Health Care   |   January 27, 2011
Download Download   
Share Share Page

The Fourth District Court of Appeal issued an important decision which confirms that Florida hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers and their governing bodies are immune from injunctive relief and liability for claims that arise out of the appointment or reappointment of members of the medical staff, absent a properly pled allegation of intentional fraud. Lawnwood Medical Center, Inc. v. Desai, No. 4D10-49 (Fla. 4th DCA Jan. 26, 2011) (slip)[1].

In Desai, a doctor was denied reappointment to the medical staff by the governing body of the hospital based on conduct and quality concerns. The lower court issued a temporary injunction permitting the doctor to continue to practice at the hospital during the pendency of the doctor’s suit against the hospital where he claimed that the hospital’s governing body had no right to deny his reappointment after the medical staff recommended him for reappointment.

On appeal, the hospital successfully argued that no injunction should have been issued because the hospital governing body's discretion on decisions related to the appointment and reappointment of the medical staff is broad and the hospital is immune from such suits based on the legislative grant of immunity in section 395.0191, Florida Statutes (2009). The Court rejected the doctor’s arguments that the statutory immunity is limited to initial appointment decisions, and that he could prevail by establishing the governing body’s decision was not supported by good cause or valid reasons without a showing of intentional fraud.

Today’s decision is extremely significant and confirms the broad scope of discretion granted hospitals and ambulatory surgery centers in the appointment of members of their medical staffs as reflected by the statutory immunity granted to healthcare facilities in this area of Florida law.

(Note: Thomas E. Warner and Dean A. Morande of Carlton Fields, P.A. led the appellate team representing the hospital in this appeal, and Walter Tache and Jennifer Christianson led the legal team at the temporary injunction hearing.)

1    The Fourth District’s decision is not yet final and subject to rehearing.


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.