Skip to Content

Connecticut Cost of Insurance Legislation Voted Out of Committee

March 23, 2012 -- On March 8, 2012, a bill pertaining to cost of insurance increases on universal life and similar policies was introduced and referred to a Connecticut joint legislative committee — the Insurance and Real Estate Committee (the "Committee").  As we reported last week in a Client Alert, the March 8th version of Connecticut Senate Bill No. 409 (the "Original Bill") proposed:  

(i) comprehensive disclosures to policyholders if a life insurance company imposed a cost of insurance increase on universal life or similar policies;

(ii) extensive filings with, and review by, the Connecticut Insurance Department (the "Department"); and

(iii) special rights for any policyholder who challenged the increase through litigation, including the right to withhold increased premium payments during the pendency of such litigation and a retroactive rescission option if the policyholder did not prevail in court.   

At a March 15th Public Hearing of the Committee, the Department and various trade organizations opposed the Original Bill, while life settlement industry participants spoke out in favor. 

At the March 20th Committee hearing a substantially revised version was considered  (the "Substitute Bill").  Consistent with the Department’s comments on the Original Bill that "the Department is not aware of any significant consumer problems to necessitate this new authority," the Substitute Bill simply adds a new notice provision to existing Connecticut Insurance Code Section 38a-430.  That section requires the filing with and approval of forms by the Commissioner prior to use in Connecticut and directs the Commissioner to disapprove any form that does not comply with the requirements of law. The Substitute Bill's new notice provision expands that statute to add the following additional sub-paragraph: 

(b)  No universal life insurance policy shall be delivered or issued for delivery to any person in this state unless it bears on its cover, in not less than twelve-point boldface type in capital letters, the following:



After a brief discussion, in which the Committee Chairman confirmed that the Bill only applies to policies issued on or after October 1, 2012, the Committee voted in favor of the Substitute Bill.  As the Substitute Bill continues through the legislative process, Jorden Burt will closely monitor developments and report further as appropriate. 

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.