Menu

Florida Legislature Rejects Bill Restricting Bad Faith Suits Against Insurers

Life, Annuity, and Retirement Litigation   |   February 7, 2012
Download   
Share Page

The Civil Justice Subcommittee of the Florida House of Representatives voted down a bill that would have imposed limitations on third-party bad faith lawsuits against insurers whose policyholders have suffered a judgment in excess of their policy liability limits.

The proposed legislation would have restricted use of a technique known as the “time limited settlement demand.”  This technique allows a claimant alleging injury caused by a policyholder to demand that the insurer settle the claim by paying policy limits within a relatively short window of time.  If the insurer does not make the payment within the time limit, the claimant typically withdraws the demand, goes to trial against the policyholder and, thereafter, sues the insurer for the amount of any judgment obtained by the claimant in excess of the policy limits.

The rejected bill would have required plaintiffs to provide a sixty-day written notice to the Florida Department of Financial Services and the insurer as a condition precedent to bringing an action for third-party statutory or common law bad faith.  If the insurer “cured” the alleged bad faith within the sixty-day period by paying the claimant's demand or the policy limits, the claimant would have been required to release the policyholder, thus, removing the threat of a bad faith action for an excess judgment.

In the absence of a legislative or judicial change to Florida's third party bad faith law practices, insurers must remain vigilant regarding time limited settlement demands.  Every time limited demand is potentially a precursor to a bad faith action that requires extra attention and prompt action.  Early claim evaluation is critical.  Claims with large damages, clear liability, low limits or short time limits are especially sensitive.


©2020 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Subscribe to Publications

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.