Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

New Addition to the Public Private Partnership Law of Florida - Another Level of Politics or a Cure for Political Games?
August 30, 2012

The Florida Legislature has just enacted a bill that adds a new Section 339.2825 which took effect July 1, 2012. That Section deals with both Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)-generated projects and unsolicited proposals for transportation projects. 

The new law requires, for FDOT-generated projects, that prior to soliciting proposals for a public private partnership project that is part of FDOT's 5- or 10-year plans, FDOT must notify the Executive Office of the Governor, the chair of each legislative appropriations committee, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by providing a summary of the proposed project, including a description of any anticipated commitment by the FDOT for the years outside the adopted work program, a description of the anticipated impacts on the FDOT's overall debt load, and sufficient information to demonstrate that the project will not cause the FDOT to exceed the overall debt limitation provided in § 339.139. 

For unsolicited proposals, prior to advertising the proposal, FDOT must notify the Executive Office of the Governor, the chair of each legislative appropriations committee, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives by providing a summary of the proposed project, including a description of any anticipated commitment by the FDOT for the years outside the adopted work program, a description of the anticipated impacts on the FDOT's overall debt load, and sufficient information to demonstrate that the project will not cause the FDOT to exceed the overall debt limitation provided in § 339.139. (Note that the statute as enacted refers to Section 339.14 but in fact, that Section does not exist. A glitch bill will need to remedy this citation.)

The Governor's approval is required for an FDOT-generated project solicitation to proceed. The approval of the Executive Office of the Governor (the Governor or someone acting for the EOG) is required for an unsolicited proposal to go forward. 

If any of the appropriations committee chairs or the President of the Senate or the Speaker of the House of Representatives objects to either an FDOT-proposed project or an unsolicited project in writing within 14 days after each receives the notification from FDOT, the Governor (or the Executive Office of the Governor) cannot move forward with the project. 

What does this mean to potential project sponsors?  First, unless the Governor and legislative leadership have actually received the summary of the project, unless the summary contains all required information, and unless the Governor (or in the case of an unsolicited proposal, the Executive Office of the Governor) actually approves the project in writing, no project RFP may be produced by FDOT.  Until an unsolicited proposal is actually approved in writing by the Executive Office of the Governor, the unsolicited proposal may not be accepted by FDOT and the process for advertising and pushing forward unsolicited proposals set forth in Florida law may not be followed by FDOT. 

To sum up, on the one hand, it is now obvious that effectively all public private partnership projects must pass political muster before they go forward.  This new law leaves one to wonder if putting forward an unsolicited proposal is really feasible as a practical matter. On the other hand, this pre-solicitation approval—at least for FDOT-generated projects—would seem to be better than having all parties spend pursuit money and time only to have the project objected to later. While nothing in the new additions to the P3 legislation of Florida bars anyone from objecting to a project after it has been approved by the Governor or the Executive Office of the Governor, an objection on political grounds after the project has been approved to move forward would seem difficult to justify.
Authored By
Image: Andrew J. Markus
Andrew J. Markus
Related Practices
Government Law & Consulting Public-Private Partnerships
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.