Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.

 Skip to Content

The Importance of Clawback Agreements in E-Discovery
December 06, 2012

Clawback agreements are an integral part of any production involving electronically stored information (ESI). Given the large volume of ESI in some cases, and the possibility of inadvertently disclosing privileged information in the course of reviewing a large production of ESI, clawback agreements should be negotiated at the outset of a case. In a clawback agreement, the parties agree that the inadvertent production of privileged information will not automatically constitute a waiver of privilege.

What is Reasonable

The starting point for a clawback agreement is Federal Rule of Evidence 502. Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b) explains the circumstances in which the inadvertent disclosure of privileged information in a federal proceeding does not operate as a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. According to Rule 502(b), the inadvertent disclosure of privileged information does not operate as a waiver where the holder of the privilege took reasonable steps to prevent disclosure and reasonable steps to rectify the error.

In negotiating a clawback agreement, the parties should consider what actions would be considered reasonable and how the parties would rectify any inadvertent disclosure. It is important to clearly spell out the reasonableness standard in order to avoid any potential disagreement in the event of a disclosure of privileged information.

Alternatively, the parties could consider waiving the reasonableness provision entirely. This would mean that the disclosure of privileged information could be clawed back without regard to the reasonability of the efforts made to prevent the disclosure.

Clawback as Part of Court Order

Consider incorporating the clawback agreement as part of a Court Order. Federal Rule of Evidence 502(e) provides that an agreement between the parties as to the effect of the inadvertent disclosure of privileged information in a federal proceeding is binding only on the parties to the agreement, unless the agreement is incorporated into a Court Order. By incorporating a clawback agreement into a Court Order, a party would effectively make the clawback agreement apply to third parties who were not initially part of the agreement.

Insist on Clawback

There may be circumstances in which a party to a federal proceeding will not agree to a clawback agreement. In such a situation, consider going to the Court directly and asking for the Court to enter an Order authorizing a clawback. Courts have authorized a clawback over the objections of one of the parties. By utilizing a clawback agreement in an ESI-intensive case, counsel can better protect the interests of the client in the event of an inadvertent disclosure.

Originally published on i-Sight.com's blog: "The Importance of Clawback Agreements in E-Discovery"
©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.