Skip to Content

Department of Labor Issues Long-Anticipated Rule Increasing Salary Level Test Applicable to White Collar Exemptions Under the FLSA


On June 30, the Department of Labor’s Wage Hour Division (WHD) issued its long-anticipated proposed rule and request for comments concerning recommended changes to the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) white collar exemptions from overtime requirements. The proposed rule was issued  in response to President Obama’s March 13, 2014 memorandum to the Secretary of Labor asking the WHD to analyze, overhaul, and streamline the exemptions, ostensibly to increase the number of employees who are eligible for overtime pay.

Since 1940, the regulations implementing the white collar exemptions have generally required that an employer pay employees overtime for hours worked in excess of 40 unless the employer could establish that:  1) it paid the employee a predetermined and fixed salary; 2) the amount of the salary met a specified level (“salary level test”); and, 3) the employee’s job duties primarily involved executive, administrative, and professional duties defined by the regulations. 

The proposed rule change impacts the “salary level test” and increases the minimum salary level, currently $455 per week, to a projected $970 per week (or $50,440 per year ) in 2016, when the rule is expected to be finalized.[1] The standard salary level was determined by looking at the 40th percentile of earnings for fulltime salaried workers from nationwide salary and wage data from the Current Population Survey, jointly administered by the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The salary level test has not been amended since 2004, and is currently below the poverty level threshold for a family of four.

Simply put, if adopted in its present form, employers will be required to pay overtime to any currently exempt executive, administrative, or professional employee who is not paid the proposed minimum salary level, regardless of the employee’s job duties and responsibilities. The Department estimates that roughly 4.6 million employees will be affected in 2016. The proposed rule also proposes automatic annual increases to the salary test to guarantee that exemption requirements keep pace with increasing wages overall, to be published annually in the Federal Register. 

Contrary to press and Bar predictions , the proposed rule does not presently recommend any changes to the duties tests in the current regulations. The Department believes that the proposed salary level change is “the simplest method for securing the effectiveness of the salary level as a bright-line for ensuring that employees entitled to the [FLSA’s] overtime protections are not exempted.” In other words, the salary level proposed is considered sufficient to keep those jobs that may be on the fringe of the exemption based on job duties from possibly being misclassified as exempt because the salary level will serve as an objective disqualifier. The Department though is still seeking comments as to whether the current duties tests meet the purpose of the exemptions, specifically asking for input into 1) whether non-exempt work should be limited either by percentage or other bases; and, 2) whether additional examples should be provided in the regulations to more fully explain the duties tests.

In addition to increased wage costs for employers, the proposed rule may also increase employer record keeping obligations under the FLSA, as the number of employees subject to daily records retention obligations will increase. Conversely, the Department proposes that FLSA litigation will decrease as the increased salary level test will provide for less ambiguity because failure to meet the salary threshold will render any evaluation of the subjective duties requirements of the exemptions unnecessary.

Interested persons have 60 days from the rule’s publication in the Federal Register to provide comments. Although not yet final, given that the current salary test has not been changed since 2004, it is unlikely that the salary level set in the Final Rule will be far off the current proposal, if changed at all.

You may submit comments, identified by Regulatory Information Number (RIN) 1235-AA11, by either of the following methods: Electronic Comments: Submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Address written submissions to Mary Ziegler, Director of the Division of Regulations, Legislation, and Interpretation, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-3502, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington D.C. 20210.


[1] The proposed rule also increases the minimum salary threshold for the highly compensated employee exemptions from $100,000 per year to $122,148 per year.

Image source: michael kooiman (Flickr)

©2024 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.


The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.