Florida Court Recognizes Need To Show Prejudice To Establish Defense Of Failure Of Conditions Precedent Under Paragraph 22 Of The Mortgage
As part of its defense at trial in a foreclosure action, the defendants asserted that the plaintiff bank failed to satisfy the condition precedent of providing notice and an opportunity to cure before filing its complaint, as required by the mortgage. Specifically, the defendants argued that, because paragraph 22 of the mortgage required that the notice provide a 30-day period to cure the default—and the letter notice provided only 29 days—the foreclosure action should be involuntarily dismissed.
The Fifth District rejected the argument, noting that the defendant failed to show prejudice, and that, “[a]bsent some prejudice, the breach of a condition precedent does not constitute a defense to the enforcement of an otherwise valid contract.”
The defendants nevertheless ultimately prevailed, as the Court reversed the final judgment of foreclosure based on a lack of evidence of standing by the plaintiff.
The decision, Gorel v. Bank of New York Mellon, 5D13-3272 (Fla. 5th DCA May 8, 2015), is not yet final.
The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.