Skip to Content

Former Florida Supreme Court Justice Challenges 6 Proposed Florida Constitutional Amendments
August 14, 2018
Former Florida Supreme Court Justice Harry Lee Anstead filed a petition for writ of quo warranto directly with the Florida Supreme Court, challenging six of the seven Florida Constitution Revision Commission proposed constitutional amendments. The amendments challenged are the six proposals that group separate proposed constitutional amendments into single ballot questions.

Former Justice Anstead argues that the ballot questions unconstitutionally group independent and unrelated proposals into a single ballot question, that the proposals violate voter rights because there cannot be a “chief purpose” in grouped amendments, and that the ballot language for each of the amendments is misleading and deceptive.

Multiple other lawsuits challenging Constitution Revision Commission proposals are winding their way through the Florida court system, as discussed in a previous alert.

With a looming September 22 deadline for election supervisors to mail overseas ballots, the courts have limited time to decide these matters before the ballots must be printed.

Carlton Fields will continue to track the 2018 Constitution Revision Commission and its amendment proposals through the election.
Authored By
Image: Aaron C. Dunlap
Aaron C. Dunlap
Related Practices
Government Law & Consulting
©2025 Carlton Fields, P.A. Carlton Fields practices law in California through Carlton Fields, LLP. Carlton Fields publications should not be construed as legal advice on any specific facts or circumstances. The contents are intended for general information and educational purposes only, and should not be relied on as if it were advice about a particular fact situation. The distribution of this publication is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship with Carlton Fields. This publication may not be quoted or referred to in any other publication or proceeding without the prior written consent of the firm, to be given or withheld at our discretion. To request reprint permission for any of our publications, please use our Contact Us form via the link below. The views set forth herein are the personal views of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the firm. This site may contain hypertext links to information created and maintained by other entities. Carlton Fields does not control or guarantee the accuracy or completeness of this outside information, nor is the inclusion of a link to be intended as an endorsement of those outside sites.

Disclaimer

The information on this website is presented as a service for our clients and Internet users and is not intended to be legal advice, nor should you consider it as such. Although we welcome your inquiries, please keep in mind that merely contacting us will not establish an attorney-client relationship between us. Consequently, you should not convey any confidential information to us until a formal attorney-client relationship has been established. Please remember that electronic correspondence on the internet is not secure and that you should not include sensitive or confidential information in messages. With that in mind, we look forward to hearing from you.